Comparison of image noise and image quality between full-dose abdominal computed tomography scans reconstructed with weighted filtered back projection and half-dose scans reconstructed with improved sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE*)
Creators
- 1. University of British Columbia, Department of Radiology, Vancouver General Hospital (Canada)
- 2. Siemens Medical Solutions (United States)
Description
Purpose
To retrospectively compare the image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and subjective image quality between CT images acquired with a dual-source, split-dose imaging protocol reconstructed at full and half doses with weighted filtered back projection (wFBP) and an improved sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction algorithm (SAFIRE*).Methods
Fifty-three consecutive patients underwent contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen using a standardized dual-source, single energy CT protocol. Half-dose images were retrospectively generated using data from one detector only. Full-dose datasets were reconstructed with wFBP, while half-dose datasets were reconstructed with wFBP and SAFIRE* strengths 1–5. Region of interest analysis was performed to assess SNR and noise. Diagnostic acceptability, subjective noise, and spatial resolution were graded on a 10-point scale by two readers. Statistical analysis was carried out with repeated measures analysis of variance, Wilcoxon signed rank test, and Cohen's κ test.
Results
With the increasing strengths of SAFIRE*, a progressive reduction in noise and increase in SNR (p < 0.01) was observed. There was a statistically significant decrease in objective noise and increase in SNR in half-dose SAFIRE* strength 4 and 5 reconstructions compared to full-dose reconstructions using wFBP (p < 0.01). Qualitative analysis revealed a progressive increase in diagnostic acceptability, decrease in subjective noise and increase in spatial resolution for half-dose images reconstructed with the increasing strengths of SAFIRE* (p < 0.01).
Conclusions
Half-dose CT images reconstructed with SAFIRE* at strength 4 and 5 have superior image quality compared to full-dose images reconstructed with wFBP. SAFIRE* potentially allows dose reductions in the order of 50% over wFBP.
Additional details
Identifiers
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Abdominal Radiology (Online)
- Journal Volume
- 44
- Journal Issue
- 1
- Journal Page Range
- p. 355-361
- ISSN
- 2366-0058
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United States
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 51086999
- Subject category
- S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
- Descriptors DEI
- ABDOMEN; ALGORITHMS; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; DATASETS; ITERATIVE METHODS; RADIATION DOSES; REDUCTION; SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO; SPATIAL RESOLUTION
- Descriptors DEC
- BODY; CALCULATION METHODS; CHEMICAL REACTIONS; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DIMENSIONLESS NUMBERS; DOCUMENT TYPES; DOSES; EVALUATION; MATHEMATICAL LOGIC; RESOLUTION; TOMOGRAPHY
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2019 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature