Published October 2021 | Version v1
Journal article

Extracolonic findings - Identification at low-dose CTC

  • 1. Department of Radiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, SE-413 45 Gothenburg (Sweden)
  • 2. Department of Radiology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, SE-413 45 Gothenburg (Sweden)
  • 3. Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, SE-413 45 Gothenburg (Sweden)
  • 4. Department of Radiation Physics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, SE-413 45 Gothenburg (Sweden)

Description

In contrast to optical colonoscopy, computed tomography colonography (CTC) has the ability to reveal pathology outside of the colon. While identification of colorectal lesions at CTC requires only limited radiation dose, the detection of abnormalities in extracolonic soft tissue requires more radiation. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of ultra-low-dose (ULD) CTC on the detection and characterisation of extracolonic findings. In a prospective study 49 patients with colorectal symptoms were examined with CTC adding a ULD series (mean effective dose 0.9 ± 0.4 mSv) to the normal unenhanced standard dose (SD) series (mean effective dose 3.6 ± 1.2 mSv). Five radiologists individually and blindly evaluated the ULD, followed by evaluation of the SD after ≥ 9 weeks (median 35 weeks). A ViewDEX-based examination protocol was used, including a confidence scale and a graded assessment of need for follow-up according to the CTC Reporting and Data System (C-RADS E0-E4). The reference findings comprised the combined information from CTC (ULD, SD and contrast-enhanced CTC series) and a 4-year radiological and clinical follow-up. For the overall detection of reference findings (E2-E4) we found a statistically significant difference in favour of SD. This, however, was not the case when looking at classification of possibly important/important reference findings (E3-E4). Our results suggest that CTC with ULD (0.9 mSv) is comparable to SD (3.6 mSv) for identification of clinically relevant extracolonic pathology, but there is a large inter-observer variability. (authors)

Availability note (English)

Available from doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncab054

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Radiation Protection Dosimetry
Journal Volume
195
Journal Issue
3-4
Journal Page Range
p. 188-197
ISSN
0144-8420

Conference

Title
Optimisation in X-ray and Molecular Imaging 2020
Acronym
OXMI 2020
Dates
22-24 Jun 2020
Place
Gothenburg (Sweden)

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
France
INIS RN
53001900
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Resource subtype / Literary indicator
Conference
Descriptors DEI
ANIMAL TISSUES; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; DETECTION; EFFECTIVE RADIATION DOSES; LARGE INTESTINE; PATHOLOGY; PATIENTS; SYMPTOMS
Descriptors DEC
BODY; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM; DOSES; GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT; INTESTINES; ORGANS; RADIATION DOSES; TOMOGRAPHY

Optional Information

Notes
24 refs.