Interaction of progenitor bone cells with different surface modifications of titanium implant
- 1. Advanced Medical Devices and Composites Laboratory, Department of Fiber and Composite Materials, College of Engineering, Feng Chia University, Taichung 40724, Taiwan (China)
- 2. Dental Medical Devices and Materials Research Center, College of Dental Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan (China)
- 3. Medical Device Development Division, Metal Industries Research and Development Centre, Kaohsiung 82151, Taiwan (China)
Description
Changes in the physical and chemical properties of Ti surfaces can be attributed to cell performance, which improves surface biocompatibility. The cell proliferation, mineralization ability, and gene expression of progenitor bone cells (D1 cell) were compared on five different Ti surfaces, namely, mechanical grinding (M), electrochemical modification through potentiostatic anodization (ECH), sandblasting and acid etching (SLA), sandblasting, hydrogen peroxide treatment, and heating (SAOH), and sandblasting, alkali heating, and etching (SMART). SAOH treatment produced the most hydrophilic surface, whereas SLA produced the most hydrophobic surface. Cell activity indicated that SLA and SMART produced significantly rougher surfaces and promoted D1 cell attachment within 1 day of culturing, whereas SAOH treatment produced moderate roughness (Ra = 1.26 μm) and accelerated the D1 cell proliferation up to 7 days after culturing. The ECH surface significantly promoted alkaline phosphatase (ALP) expression and osteocalcin (OCN) secretion in the D1 cells compared with the other surface groups. The ECH and SMART-treated Ti surfaces resulted in maximum ALP and OCN expressions during the D1 cell culture. SLA, SAOH, and SMART substrate surfaces were rougher and exhibited better cell metabolic responses during the early stage of cell attachment, proliferation, and morphologic expressions within 1 day of D1 cell culture. The D1 cells cultured on the ECH and SMART substrates exhibited higher differentiation, and higher ALP and OCN expressions after 10 days of culture. Thus, the ECH and SMART treatments promote better ability of cell mineralization in vitro, which demonstrate their great potential for clinical use. - Highlights: • Progenitor bone cells onto Ti with different modifications are characterized. • Surface roughness and hydrophilicity encourage early stage cell attachment. • Composition and surface treatments are more vital in bone cell mineralization. • Electrochemical treatment bears the best potential in future clinical practice
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2014.01.022Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.msec.2014.01.022;
- PII
- S0928-4931(14)00030-7;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Materials Science and Engineering. C, Biomimetic Materials, Sensors and Systems
- Journal Volume
- 37
- Journal Page Range
- p. 305-313
- ISSN
- 0928-4931
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Netherlands
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 46056565
- Subject category
- S36: MATERIALS SCIENCE; S60: APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES;
- Descriptors DEI
- ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; ANODIZATION; BONE CELLS; CELL CULTURES; CELL PROLIFERATION; CHEMICAL PROPERTIES; IN VITRO; INTERACTIONS; MINERALIZATION; PROLIFERATION; SUBSTRATES; SURFACES; TITANIUM
- Descriptors DEC
- ANIMAL CELLS; CHEMICAL COATING; CONNECTIVE TISSUE CELLS; CORROSION PROTECTION; DEPOSITION; ELECTROCHEMICAL COATING; ELECTROLYSIS; ELEMENTS; ENZYMES; ESTERASES; HYDROLASES; LYSIS; METALS; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; PHOSPHATASES; PROTEINS; SOMATIC CELLS; SURFACE COATING; TRANSITION ELEMENTS
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2014 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.