Published August 2013 | Version v1
Journal article

Divide and conquer is always best: sensitivity of methyl correlation experiments

  • 1. Carnegie Mellon University, Department of Biological Sciences (United States)
  • 2. University of Pittsburgh, Department of Biological Sciences (United States)

Description

The HMCM [CG]CBCA experiment (Tugarinov and Kay in J Am Chem Soc 125:13868–13878, 2003) correlates methyl carbon and proton shifts to Cγ, Cβ, and Cα resonances for the purpose of resonance assignments. The relative sensitivity of the HMCM[CG]CBCA sequence experiment is compared to a divide-and-conquer approach to assess whether it is best to collect all of the methyl correlations at once, or to perform separate experiments for each correlation. A straightforward analysis shows that the divide-and-conquer approach is intrinsically more sensitive, and should always be used to obtain methyl-Cγ, Cβ, and Cα correlations. The improvement in signal-to-noise associated with separate experiments is illustrated by the detection of methyl-aliphatic correlations in a 65 kDa protein-DNA complex

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Journal of Biomolecular NMR
Journal Volume
56
Journal Issue
4
Journal Page Range
p. 331-335
ISSN
0925-2738

INIS

Country of Publication
Netherlands
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
45028142
Subject category
S60: APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES;
Descriptors DEI
ALLOCATIONS; CARBON; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; CORRELATIONS; DNA; NMR SPECTRA; PROTEINS; PROTONS; SENSITIVITY
Descriptors DEC
BARYONS; ELEMENTARY PARTICLES; ELEMENTS; EVALUATION; FERMIONS; HADRONS; NONMETALS; NUCLEIC ACIDS; NUCLEONS; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; SPECTRA

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht