Optimization of organic Rankine cycle power systems considering multistage axial turbine design
- 1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Nils Koppels Allé, Building 403, 2800 Kongens Lyngby (Denmark)
- 2. Dipartimento di Energia, Politecnico di Milano, Via Lambruschini 4, 20156 Milano (Italy)
Description
Highlights: • A design methodology for ORC considering multistage axial turbine design is presented. • A multistage axial turbine model is presented and validated. • The methodology is applied to a waste heat recovery case on a container ship. • n-butane and R245fa show the best trade-off between cycle and turbine design. • The best solutions feature a single-stage with highly supersonic flow conditions. - Abstract: Organic Rankine cycle power systems represent a viable and efficient solution for the exploitation of medium-to-low temperature heat sources. Despite the large number of commissioned units, there is limited literature on the design and optimization of organic Rankine cycle power systems considering multistage turbine design. This work presents a preliminary design methodology and working fluid selection for organic Rankine cycle units featuring multistage axial turbines. The method is then applied to the case of waste heat recovery from a large marine diesel engine. A multistage axial turbine model is presented and validated with the best available data from literature. The methodology allows the identification of the most suitable working fluid considering the trade-off between cycle and multistage turbine designs. The results of the optimization of cycle and turbine suggest that the fluid n-butane yields the best compromise in terms of cycle net power output, turbine cost and efficiency for the considered case study. When a conservative design approach is adopted, the turbine features a two-stage configuration with supersonic converging nozzles and post-expansion. Conversely, a single-stage turbine featuring a supersonic converging-diverging nozzle and Mach number up to 2 is the resulting ideal choice when a more advanced design approach is implemented.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.09.068Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.09.068;
- PII
- S0306261917313454;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Applied Energy
- Journal Volume
- 209
- Journal Page Range
- p. 339-354
- ISSN
- 0306-2619
- CODEN
- APENDX
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 50007786
- Subject category
- S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
- Descriptors DEI
- DESIGN; DIESEL ENGINES; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; HEAT SOURCES; MATHEMATICAL SOLUTIONS; OPTIMIZATION; RANKINE CYCLE; RANKINE CYCLE POWER SYSTEMS; TURBINES; WASTE HEAT; WORKING FLUIDS
- Descriptors DEC
- EFFICIENCY; ENERGY; ENERGY SYSTEMS; ENGINES; EQUIPMENT; FLUIDS; HEAT; HEAT ENGINES; INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES; MACHINERY; POWER SYSTEMS; THERMODYNAMIC CYCLES; TURBOMACHINERY; WASTES
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2017 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.