A JAFROC study of nodule detection performance in CT images of a thorax acquired during PET/CT
- 1. Radiology, Furness General Hospital, University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust, Dalton Lane, Barrow-in-Furness, Cumbria, LA14 4LF (United Kingdom)
- 2. Directorate of Radiography, University of Salford, Greater Manchester, M6 6PU (United Kingdom)
- 3. School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Care, Robert Gordon University, Garthdee Road, Aberdeen, AB10 7QG (United Kingdom)
- 4. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, Prescot Street, Liverpool, L7 8XP (United Kingdom)
- 5. Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, SE-171 77 (Sweden)
Description
Purpose: Two types of CT images (modalities) are acquired in PET/CT: for attenuation correction (AC) and diagnosis. The purpose of the study was to compare nodule detection and localization performance between these two modalities. Methods: CT images, using both modalities, of an anthropomorphic chest phantom containing zero or more simulated spherical nodules of 5, 8, 10 and 12 mm diameters and contrasts −800, −630 and 100 HU were acquired. An observer performance study using nine observers interpreting 45 normal (zero nodules) images and 47 abnormal images (1–3 nodules; average 1.26) was conducted using the free-response receiver operating characteristic (FROC) paradigm. Data were analysed using an R software package implemented jackknife alternative FROC (JAFROC) analysis. Both empirical areas under the equally weighted AFROC curve (wAFROC) and under the highest rating inferred ROC (HR-ROC) curve were used as figures of merit (FOM). To control the probability of Type I error test alpha was set at 0.05. Results: Nodule detection as measured by either FOM was significantly better on the diagnostic quality images (2nd modality), irrespective of the method of analysis, [reader averaged inter-modality wAFROC FOM difference = −0.07 (−0.11,−0.04); reader averaged inter-modality HR-ROC FOM difference = −0.05 (−0.09, −0.01)]. Conclusion: Nodule detection was statistically worse on images acquired for AC; suggesting that images acquired for AC should not be used to evaluate pulmonary pathology. - Highlights: • An evaluation of lesion detection performance in CT images of different qualities is proposed. • JAFROC analysis showed that images acquired for attenuation correction are statistically poorer for lesion detection. • This study suggests that images acquired for attenuation correction should not be used to evaluate pulmonary pathology.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2017.03.001Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.radi.2017.03.001;
- PII
- S1078-8174(17)30014-7;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Radiography (London 1995)
- Journal Volume
- 23
- Journal Issue
- 3
- Journal Page Range
- p. 191-196
- ISSN
- 1078-8174
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 49049784
- Subject category
- S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
- Descriptors DEI
- ATTENUATION; CHEST; COMPUTER CODES; CORRECTIONS; PERFORMANCE; POSITRON COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; SPHERICAL CONFIGURATION
- Descriptors DEC
- BODY; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; CONFIGURATION; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; EMISSION COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; TOMOGRAPHY
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2017 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.