Published March 2018 | Version v1
Journal article

Modeling ecotoxicity impacts in vineyard production: Addressing spatial differentiation for copper fungicides

  • 1. Institute of Environmental Science and Technology (ICTA), Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona (UAB), E-08193, Bellaterra, Barcelona (Spain)
  • 2. Institute for Food and Agricultural Research and Technology (IRTA), Torre Marimon, E-08140, Caldes de Montbui, Barcelona (Spain)
  • 3. Quantitative Sustainability Assessment Division, Department of Management Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Bygningstorvet 116, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby (Denmark)

Description

Highlights: • USEtox 2.02 was used to compare the freshwater ecotoxicity impacts of 12 fungicides AI. • Impacts for Cu(II) vary ~ 3 orders of magnitude among the 7 European water types analyzed. • Site-dependent characterization factors for Cu(II) in 15,034 European vineyards soils were derived. • Soil impacts for Cu(II) vary 2 orders according to different agricultural scenarios. • Including spatial differentiation in copper hazard for LCA provide more accurate results in toxicity impact evaluation. Application of plant protection products (PPP) is a fundamental practice for viticulture. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) has proved to be a useful tool to assess the environmental performance of agricultural production, where including toxicity-related impacts for PPP use is still associated with methodological limitations, especially for inorganic (i.e. metal-based) pesticides. Downy mildew is one of the most severe diseases for vineyard production. For disease control, copper-based fungicides are the most effective and used PPP in both conventional and organic viticulture. This study aims to improve the toxicity-related characterization of copper-based fungicides (Cu) for LCA studies. Potential freshwater ecotoxicity impacts of 12 active ingredients used to control downy mildew in European vineyards were quantified and compared. Soil ecotoxicity impacts were calculated for specific soil chemistries and textures. To introduce spatial differentiation for Cu in freshwater and soil ecotoxicity characterization, we used 7 European water archetypes and a set of 15,034 non-calcareous vineyard soils for 4 agricultural scenarios. Cu ranked as the most impacting substance for potential freshwater ecotoxicity among the 12 studied active ingredients. With the inclusion of spatial differentiation, Cu toxicity potentials vary 3 orders of magnitude, making variation according to water archetypes potentially relevant. In the case of non-calcareous soils ecotoxicity characterization, the variability of Cu impacts in different receiving environments is about 2 orders of magnitude. Our results show that Cu potential toxicity depends mainly on its capacity to interact with the emission site, and the dynamics of this interaction (speciation). These results represent a better approximation to understand Cu potential toxicity impact profiles, assisting decision makers to better understand copper behavior concerning the receiving environment and therefore how restrictions on the use of copper-based fungicides should be considered in relation to the emission site.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.243

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.243;
PII
S0048969717329613;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Science of the Total Environment
Journal Volume
616
Journal Page Range
p. 796-804
ISSN
0048-9697
CODEN
STENDL

INIS

Country of Publication
Netherlands
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
53016784
Subject category
S54: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES;
Descriptors DEI
COPPER; DISEASES; ENVIRONMENT; FRESH WATER; FUNGICIDES; HAZARDS; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT; MILDEW; SIMULATION; SOIL CHEMISTRY; SOILS; TOXICITY
Descriptors DEC
CHEMISTRY; ELEMENTS; EUMYCOTA; FUNGI; HYDROGEN COMPOUNDS; METALS; OXYGEN COMPOUNDS; PARASITES; PESTICIDES; PLANTS; TRANSITION ELEMENTS; WATER

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.