Published July 2016 | Version v1
Journal article

MRI and contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging for evaluation of focal irreversible electroporation treatment: results from a phase I-II study in patients undergoing IRE followed by radical prostatectomy

  • 1. University of Amsterdam, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (Netherlands)
  • 2. University of Amsterdam, Department of Urology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (Netherlands)
  • 3. University of Amsterdam, Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (Netherlands)
  • 4. University of Amsterdam, Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (Netherlands)
  • 5. University of Athens, Sismanoglio General Hospital, 2nd Department of Urology, Marousi (Greece)
  • 6. University of Amsterdam, Department of Pathology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (Netherlands)
  • 7. Eindhoven University of Technology, Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven (Netherlands)

Description

Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is an ablative therapy with a low side-effect profile in prostate cancer. The objective was: 1) To compare the volumetric IRE ablation zone on grey-scale transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) with histopathology findings; 2) To determine a reliable imaging modality to visualize the IRE ablation effects accurately. A prospective phase I-II study was performed in 16 patients scheduled for radical prostatectomy (RP). IRE of the prostate was performed 4 weeks before RP. Prior to, and 4 weeks after the IRE treatment, imaging was performed by TRUS, CEUS, and mpMRI. 3D-analysis of the ablation volumes on imaging and on H and E-stained whole-mount sections was performed. The volumes were compared and the correlation was calculated. Evaluation of the imaging demonstrated that with T2-weighted MRI, dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI, and CEUS, effects of IRE are visible. T2MRI and CEUS closely match the volumes on histopathology (Pearson correlation r = 0.88 resp. 0.80). However, IRE is not visible with TRUS. mpMRI and CEUS are appropriate for assessing IRE effects and are the most feasible imaging modalities to visualize IRE ablation zone. The imaging is concordant with results of histopathological examination. (orig.)

Availability note (English)

Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-4042-3

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
European Radiology
Journal Volume
26
Journal Issue
7
Journal Page Range
p. 2252-2260
ISSN
0938-7994
CODEN
EURAE3