Published June 1, 2019 | Version v1
Journal article

Patient-reported outcomes in the phase 3 BFORE trial of bosutinib versus imatinib for newly diagnosed chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia

  • 1. University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (United States)
  • 2. University of Milano-Bicocca (Italy)
  • 3. University of Utah (United States)
  • 4. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (United States)
  • 5. Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore General Hospital (Singapore)
  • 6. The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St. Mary's Hematology Hospital, Leukemia Research Institute (Korea, Republic of)
  • 7. Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital (United Kingdom)
  • 8. Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Germany)
  • 9. IRYCIS, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal (Spain)
  • 10. Pfizer Inc (United States)
  • 11. Universitätsklinikum Jena, Klinik für Innere Medizin II (Germany)
  • 12. Universitätsklinikum RWTH Aachen, Department of Hematology and Oncology (Germany)

Description

Background

In the phase 3 BFORE trial (NCT02130557), treatment with bosutinib resulted in a significantly higher major molecular response rate at 12 months versus imatinib in the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population of patients with newly diagnosed chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP CML). Assessment of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) was an exploratory objective.

Methods

Patients with newly diagnosed CP CML were randomized 1:1 to receive once-daily bosutinib 400 mg or imatinib 400 mg as first-line therapy. Patients completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Leukemia (FACT-Leu) and EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaires at baseline, every 3 months for the first 24 months of treatment, every 6 months thereafter, and at treatment completion. We report PRO results at month 12 in the mITT population (bosutinib: n = 246; imatinib: n = 241).

Results

Mean FACT-Leu combined and subscale scores were similar at baseline in the bosutinib and imatinib arms; at month 12, all scores demonstrated improvement or maintenance of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in both treatment arms. Repeated-measures mixed-effects models showed no significant difference between bosutinib and imatinib for any FACT-Leu score. Functional health status, as measured by EQ-5D, also demonstrated improvement or maintenance with bosutinib and imatinib at month 12.

Conclusions

Similar improvements in PROs compared with baseline were seen after 12 months of treatment with first-line bosutinib or imatinib in the BFORE trial. Newly diagnosed patients with CP CML receiving bosutinib or imatinib can preserve or improve HRQoL during treatment, although clinical efficacy was superior with bosutinib.

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
Journal Volume
145
Journal Issue
6
Journal Page Range
p. 1589-1599
ISSN
0171-5216
CODEN
JCROD7

INIS

Country of Publication
Germany
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
54072704
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
DIAGNOSIS; MYELOID LEUKEMIA; PATIENTS; QUALITY OF LIFE; THERAPY
Descriptors DEC
DISEASES; IMMUNE SYSTEM DISEASES; LEUKEMIA; MEDICINE; NEOPLASMS

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2019 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature
Collaborations
the BFORE Study Investigators