Uncertainties of target volume delineation in MRI guided adaptive brachytherapy of cervix cancer: A multi-institutional study
Creators
- 1. Division of Radiotherapy, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Zaloška c. 2 (Slovenia)
- 2. Radiation Oncology Department, National Center for Cancer Care and Research, Doha (Qatar)
- 3. University of Primorska, Faculty of Mathematics, Natural Sciences and Information Technologies, Koper (Slovenia)
- 4. Division of Research and Education, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana (Slovenia)
- 5. Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University (Denmark)
- 6. Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital (Denmark)
- 7. Department of Radiotherapy and Radiobiology, Medical University of Vienna (Austria)
- 8. Division of Human Health, International Atomic Agency, Vienna (Austria)
- 9. Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna (Austria)
- 10. Department of Radiotherapy, Metropolitan Hospital, Athens (Greece)
- 11. Department of Physics, University of Oslo (Norway)
- 12. Department for Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety, Norwegian Radiation Protection Authority, Østerås (Norway)
- 13. Department of Medical Physics, Oslo University Hospital, The Radium Hospital (Norway)
Description
Background and aim: We aimed to quantify target volume delineation uncertainties in cervix cancer image guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT). Materials and methods: Ten radiation oncologists delineated gross tumour volume (GTV), high- and intermediate-risk clinical target volume (HR CTV, IR CTV) in six patients. Their contours were compared with two reference delineations (STAPLE-Simultaneous Truth and Performance Level Estimation and EC- expert consensus) by calculating volumetric and planar conformity index (VCI and PCI) and inter-delineation distances (IDD). Results: VCISTAPLE and VCIEC were 0.76 and 0.72 for HR CTV, 0.77 and 0.68 for IR CTV and 0.59 and 0.58 for GTV. Variation was most prominent caudally and cranially in all target volumes and posterolaterally in IR CTV. IDDSTAPLE and IDDEC for HR CTV (3.6 ± 3.5 and 3.8 ± 3.4 mm) were significantly lower than for GTV (4.8 ± 4.2 and 4.2 ± 3.5 mm) and IR CTV (4.7 ± 5.2 and 5.2 ± 5.6 mm) (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Due to lower delineation uncertainties when compared to GTV and IR CTV, HR CTV may be considered most robust volume for dose prescription and optimization in cervix cancer IGABT. Adequate imaging, training and use of contouring recommendations are main strategies to minimize delineation uncertainties
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2013.01.014Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.01.014;
- PII
- S0167-8140(13)00043-1;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Radiotherapy and Oncology
- Journal Volume
- 107
- Journal Issue
- 1
- Journal Page Range
- p. 6-12
- ISSN
- 0167-8140
- CODEN
- RAONDT
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Ireland
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 45088181
- Subject category
- S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
- Descriptors DEI
- BRACHYTHERAPY; CARCINOMAS; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; NMR IMAGING; OPTIMIZATION; PLANNING; UROGENITAL SYSTEM DISEASES; VARIATIONS
- Descriptors DEC
- DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DISEASES; EVALUATION; MEDICINE; NEOPLASMS; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; RADIOLOGY; RADIOTHERAPY; THERAPY
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2013 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.