Published April 2013 | Version v1
Journal article

Uncertainties of target volume delineation in MRI guided adaptive brachytherapy of cervix cancer: A multi-institutional study

  • 1. Division of Radiotherapy, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Zaloška c. 2 (Slovenia)
  • 2. Radiation Oncology Department, National Center for Cancer Care and Research, Doha (Qatar)
  • 3. University of Primorska, Faculty of Mathematics, Natural Sciences and Information Technologies, Koper (Slovenia)
  • 4. Division of Research and Education, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana (Slovenia)
  • 5. Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University (Denmark)
  • 6. Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital (Denmark)
  • 7. Department of Radiotherapy and Radiobiology, Medical University of Vienna (Austria)
  • 8. Division of Human Health, International Atomic Agency, Vienna (Austria)
  • 9. Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna (Austria)
  • 10. Department of Radiotherapy, Metropolitan Hospital, Athens (Greece)
  • 11. Department of Physics, University of Oslo (Norway)
  • 12. Department for Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety, Norwegian Radiation Protection Authority, Østerås (Norway)
  • 13. Department of Medical Physics, Oslo University Hospital, The Radium Hospital (Norway)

Description

Background and aim: We aimed to quantify target volume delineation uncertainties in cervix cancer image guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT). Materials and methods: Ten radiation oncologists delineated gross tumour volume (GTV), high- and intermediate-risk clinical target volume (HR CTV, IR CTV) in six patients. Their contours were compared with two reference delineations (STAPLE-Simultaneous Truth and Performance Level Estimation and EC- expert consensus) by calculating volumetric and planar conformity index (VCI and PCI) and inter-delineation distances (IDD). Results: VCISTAPLE and VCIEC were 0.76 and 0.72 for HR CTV, 0.77 and 0.68 for IR CTV and 0.59 and 0.58 for GTV. Variation was most prominent caudally and cranially in all target volumes and posterolaterally in IR CTV. IDDSTAPLE and IDDEC for HR CTV (3.6 ± 3.5 and 3.8 ± 3.4 mm) were significantly lower than for GTV (4.8 ± 4.2 and 4.2 ± 3.5 mm) and IR CTV (4.7 ± 5.2 and 5.2 ± 5.6 mm) (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Due to lower delineation uncertainties when compared to GTV and IR CTV, HR CTV may be considered most robust volume for dose prescription and optimization in cervix cancer IGABT. Adequate imaging, training and use of contouring recommendations are main strategies to minimize delineation uncertainties

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2013.01.014

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.radonc.2013.01.014;
PII
S0167-8140(13)00043-1;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Radiotherapy and Oncology
Journal Volume
107
Journal Issue
1
Journal Page Range
p. 6-12
ISSN
0167-8140
CODEN
RAONDT

INIS

Country of Publication
Ireland
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
45088181
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
BRACHYTHERAPY; CARCINOMAS; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; NMR IMAGING; OPTIMIZATION; PLANNING; UROGENITAL SYSTEM DISEASES; VARIATIONS
Descriptors DEC
DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DISEASES; EVALUATION; MEDICINE; NEOPLASMS; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; RADIOLOGY; RADIOTHERAPY; THERAPY

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2013 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.