Published May 2016 | Version v1
Report Open

A critical experimental test of synchrotron radiation theory with 3rd generation light source

  • 1. European XFEL GmbH, Hamburg (Germany)
  • 2. Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron (DESY), Hamburg (Germany)

Description

A recent ''beam splitting'' experiment at LCLS apparently demonstrated that after a microbunched electron beam is kicked on a large angle compared to the divergence of the FEL radiation, the microbunching wave front is readjusted along the new direction of motion of the kicked beam. Therefore, coherent radiation from an undulator placed after the kicker is emitted along the kicked direction without suppression. This strong emission of coherent undulator radiation in the kicked direction cannot be explained in the framework of conventional synchrotron radiation theory. In a previous paper we explained this puzzle. We demonstrated that, in accelerator physics, the coupling of fields and particles is based, on the one hand, on the use of results from particle dynamics treated according to the absolute time convention and, on the other hand, on the use of Maxwell equations treated according to the standard (Einstein) synchronization convention. Here lies the misconception which led to the strong qualitative disagreement between theory and experiment. After the ''beam splitting'' experiment at LCLS, it became clear that the conventional theory of synchrotron radiation cannot ensure the correct description of coherent and spontaneous emission from a kicked electron beam, nor the emission from a beam with finite angular divergence, in an undulator or a bending magnet. However, this result requires further experimental confirmation. In this publication we propose an uncomplicated and inexpensive experiment to test synchrotron radiation theory at 3rd generation light sources.

Files

47081491.pdf

Files (422.0 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:dd81144890c90e8a7f8a731567f3d067
422.0 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Publishing Information

Imprint Pagination
18 p.
ISSN
0418-9833
Report number
DESY--16-079