Value of response to anesthetic injection during hip MR arthrography to differentiate between intra- and extra-articular pathology
Creators
- 1. Department of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (United States)
- 2. Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (United States)
- 3. Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA (United States)
Description
To determine the value of anesthetic injection during hip MR arthrography (anesthetic MRA) to differentiate between intra- and extra-articular pathology in patients with hip pain. This retrospective study was IRB-approved and HIPAA-compliant. We included 75 consecutive adult patients (46 women, mean age 38 ± 13 years) who were referred for MRA. All patients underwent a focused hip examination including active flexion, passive flexion, and passive flexion with internal and external rotation, immediately prior to injection. Anesthetic MRA was performed following fluoroscopically guided intra-articular injection of contrast mixed with anesthetic. Following the injection, the hip examination was repeated, and the pain response was recorded. Clinical records, including response to corticosteroid injections, physical therapy notes, and operative reports were reviewed for verification of intra- and extra-articular pathology as the source of hip pain (gold standard). The positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPP) of anesthetic MRA to differentiate between intra- and extra-articular pathology were calculated. On MRI, 41 patients had only intra-articular and 5 patients only extra-articular pathology, while 29 patients had both, intra- and extra-articular pathology. Forty-three patients had pain relief and 32 patients had no pain relief after anesthetic injection. PPV of anesthetic MRA to detect intra-articular pathology was 91% and NPV was 67%. Anesthetic MRA can be used as an adjunct to define the origin of hip pain. A positive response suggests intra-articular pathology which can be helpful to localize the source of pain in equivocal cases where both intra- and extra-articular pathology are evident on MRI.
Availability note (English)
Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00256-019-03323-9Additional details
Identifiers
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Skeletal Radiology
- Journal Volume
- 49
- Journal Issue
- 4
- Journal Page Range
- p. 555-561
- ISSN
- 0364-2348
- CODEN
- SKRADI
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Germany
- Country of Input or Organization
- Germany
- INIS RN
- 51042480
- Subject category
- S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
- Descriptors DEI
- ADULTS; ANESTHETICS; BONE JOINTS; CONTRAST MEDIA; CORTICOSTEROIDS; FEMUR; IMAGE PROCESSING; INTRAVENOUS INJECTION; NMR IMAGING; PAIN; PATHOLOGY; PELVIS; RELAXATION TIME; ROTATION; SENSITIVITY; SOCIO-ECONOMIC FACTORS; SPECIFICITY; VERIFICATION; WEIGHTING FUNCTIONS
- Descriptors DEC
- ADRENAL HORMONES; AGE GROUPS; BODY; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM AGENTS; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM DEPRESSANTS; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DRUGS; FUNCTIONS; HORMONES; HYDROXY COMPOUNDS; INJECTION; INSTITUTIONAL FACTORS; INTAKE; KETONES; MOTION; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; ORGANS; PREGNANES; PROCESSING; SKELETON; STEROID HORMONES; STEROIDS; SYMPTOMS