Published February 2021 | Version v1
Journal article

Novel designs of hybrid thermal energy storage system and operation strategies for concentrated solar power plant

  • 1. Key Laboratory of Thermo-Fluid Science and Engineering of MOE, School of Energy and Power Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710049 (China)
  • 2. Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853 (United States)

Description

Highlights: • Hybrid thermal energy storage system and operation strategies (HTESS) are proposed. • Utility factor of hybrid systems are improved by 12.5–22.1%. • Unit cost for heat storage is reduced by 8.6% with new designs. • New designs can enhance annual electricity generation up to 14.1%. Packed-bed thermal energy storage (PBTES) has advantage of being relatively low cost, but suffers from low utility factor, compared with two-tank thermal energy storage (TTES). This paper proposes two new designs of hybrid thermal energy storage system (HTESS), consisting of PBTES and TTES, and corresponding operation strategies: HTESS-TS for thermocline storage and HTESS-OTC for outlet temperature control. Firstly, structures and operation strategies of HTESS-TS and HTESS-OTC are described in detail. Then, thermal and economic performances of HTESS and single-tank thermal energy storage system (STESS) only containing PBTES in stand-alone state are compared. Next, effects of cut-off temperature and thermal capacity of TTES are analyzed. Finally, under realistic solar radiation, annual performance of concentrated solar power plant (CSP) with different thermal energy storage systems are compared. Results show that compared with STESS, utility factors of HTESS-TS and HTESS-OTC are improved by 12.5% and 22.1% respectively. Meanwhile, unit cost of HTESS-OTC is 8.6% lower than that of STESS. In addition, for a broad range of outlet temperature limits, HTESS-OTC can maintain more stable outlet temperature, higher utility factor than STESS. Compared with STESS, annual generated electricity induced by HTESS-TS and HTESS-OTC increase by 9.8% and 14.1% respectively.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.119281

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.energy.2020.119281;
PII
S0360544220323884;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Energy (Oxford)
Journal Volume
216
Journal Page Range
vp.
ISSN
0360-5442
CODEN
ENEYDS

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
53123761
Subject category
S14: SOLAR ENERGY; S25: ENERGY STORAGE;
Descriptors DEI
DESIGN; ELECTRICITY; ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEMS; PACKED BEDS; PERFORMANCE; POWER GENERATION; SEASONAL THERMAL ENERGY STORAGE; SOLAR POWER PLANTS; SOLAR RADIATION; TEMPERATURE CONTROL; THERMOCLINE
Descriptors DEC
CONTROL; ENERGY STORAGE; ENERGY SYSTEMS; HEAT STORAGE; POWER PLANTS; RADIATIONS; STELLAR RADIATION; STORAGE

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd.