Published February 2012 | Version v1
Journal article

Life cycle analysis of energy supply infrastructure for conventional and electric vehicles

  • 1. MIT PP—Sustainable Energy Systems (Portugal)
  • 2. IDMEC Department of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Lisbon, Av. Rovisco Pais 1, Pav. Mec. I, 2 andar, 1049-001 Lisboa (Portugal)

Description

Electric drive vehicle technologies are being considered as possible solutions to mitigate environmental problems and fossil fuels dependence. Several studies have used life cycle analysis technique, to assess energy use and CO2 emissions, addressing fuels Well-to-Wheel life cycle or vehicle's materials Cradle-to-Grave. However, none has considered the required infrastructures for fuel supply. This study presents a methodology to evaluate energy use and CO2 emissions from construction, maintenance and decommissioning of support infrastructures for electricity and fossil fuel supply of vehicles applied to Portugal case study. Using Global Warming Potential and Cumulative Energy Demand, three light-duty vehicle technologies were considered: Gasoline, Diesel and Electric. For fossil fuels, the extraction well, platform, refinery and refuelling stations were considered. For the Electric Vehicle, the Portuguese 2010 electric mix, grid and the foreseen charging point's network were studied. Obtained values were 0.6–1.5 gCO2eq/km and 0.03–0.07 MJeq/km for gasoline, 0.6–1.6 gCO2eq/km and 0.02–0.06 MJeq/km for diesel, 3.7–8.5 gCO2eq/km and 0.06–0.17 MJeq/km for EV. Monte Carlo technique was used for uncertainty analysis. We concluded that EV supply infrastructures are more carbon and energetic intensive. Contribution in overall vehicle LCA does not exceed 8%. - Highlights: ► ISO 14040 was applied to evaluate fuel supply infrastructures of ICE and EV. ► CED and GWP are used to assess the impact on WTW and CTG stages. ► EV chargers rate and ICE stations' lifetime influence uncertainty the most. ► EV facilities are more carbon and energetic intense than conventional fuels. ► Contribution of infrastructures in overall vehicle LCA does not exceed 8%.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.11.015

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.enpol.2011.11.015;
PII
S0301-4215(11)00892-5;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Energy Policy
Journal Volume
41
Journal Page Range
p. 537-547
ISSN
0301-4215
CODEN
ENPYAC

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2011 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.