Life cycle analysis of energy supply infrastructure for conventional and electric vehicles
- 1. MIT PP—Sustainable Energy Systems (Portugal)
- 2. IDMEC Department of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Lisbon, Av. Rovisco Pais 1, Pav. Mec. I, 2 andar, 1049-001 Lisboa (Portugal)
Description
Electric drive vehicle technologies are being considered as possible solutions to mitigate environmental problems and fossil fuels dependence. Several studies have used life cycle analysis technique, to assess energy use and CO2 emissions, addressing fuels Well-to-Wheel life cycle or vehicle's materials Cradle-to-Grave. However, none has considered the required infrastructures for fuel supply. This study presents a methodology to evaluate energy use and CO2 emissions from construction, maintenance and decommissioning of support infrastructures for electricity and fossil fuel supply of vehicles applied to Portugal case study. Using Global Warming Potential and Cumulative Energy Demand, three light-duty vehicle technologies were considered: Gasoline, Diesel and Electric. For fossil fuels, the extraction well, platform, refinery and refuelling stations were considered. For the Electric Vehicle, the Portuguese 2010 electric mix, grid and the foreseen charging point's network were studied. Obtained values were 0.6–1.5 gCO2eq/km and 0.03–0.07 MJeq/km for gasoline, 0.6–1.6 gCO2eq/km and 0.02–0.06 MJeq/km for diesel, 3.7–8.5 gCO2eq/km and 0.06–0.17 MJeq/km for EV. Monte Carlo technique was used for uncertainty analysis. We concluded that EV supply infrastructures are more carbon and energetic intensive. Contribution in overall vehicle LCA does not exceed 8%. - Highlights: ► ISO 14040 was applied to evaluate fuel supply infrastructures of ICE and EV. ► CED and GWP are used to assess the impact on WTW and CTG stages. ► EV chargers rate and ICE stations' lifetime influence uncertainty the most. ► EV facilities are more carbon and energetic intense than conventional fuels. ► Contribution of infrastructures in overall vehicle LCA does not exceed 8%.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.11.015Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.11.015;
- PII
- S0301-4215(11)00892-5;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Energy Policy
- Journal Volume
- 41
- Journal Page Range
- p. 537-547
- ISSN
- 0301-4215
- CODEN
- ENPYAC
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 43105490
- Subject category
- S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
- Descriptors DEI
- CARBON; CARBON DIOXIDE; ELECTRICITY; ENERGY CONSUMPTION; ENERGY DEMAND; ENERGY POLICY; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; FOSSIL FUELS; FUEL CELLS; GASOLINE; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; HYBRIDIZATION; INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES; LIFE CYCLE; METHANE; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PORTUGAL; VEHICLES
- Descriptors DEC
- ALKANES; CALCULATION METHODS; CARBON COMPOUNDS; CARBON OXIDES; CHALCOGENIDES; CLIMATIC CHANGE; DEMAND; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; DIRECT ENERGY CONVERTERS; ELECTROCHEMICAL CELLS; ELEMENTS; ENERGY SOURCES; ENGINES; EUROPE; FUELS; GOVERNMENT POLICIES; HEAT ENGINES; HYDROCARBONS; LIQUID FUELS; NONMETALS; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; OXIDES; OXYGEN COMPOUNDS; PETROLEUM PRODUCTS; WESTERN EUROPE
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2011 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.