Comparative analyses of coated and composite UN fuel – Monte Carlo based full core LWR study

Highlights: •Neutronic analyses for coated fuel concept are performed for BEAVRS core. •Comparison of coated fuel is made with simple and composite UN fuel. •Core power peaking factor remains largely unchanged. •UN fuel exhibits noticeable spectral hardening. •Approximately 19% increase in EFPDs is obtained with 95% TD UN fuel option. -- Abstract: Longer continuous operation of a nuclear reactor leads to higher availability of nuclear power plant, entailing economic gain. In this context the option being explored, recently, is the use of higher density fuels as compared to current fuels i.e. UO₂. Uranium mono nitride (UN) fuel is one of the options being explored in this regard. UN fuel has been used in nuclear industry for a long time with fast reactor option. More recently, studies have targeted its use in Light Water Reactor (LWR) environment. The main problem with using UN fuel in LWR is its potential reaction with water which produces hydrogen. Researchers have proposed different approaches to overcome this problem. One option is the use of coatings around UN fuel pellet to avoid the direct contact of water with fuel. The second option is use of a secondary phase (10 vol. percent) like ZrO₂ which can make an oxide layer in case of contact with water and protect the main phase, Uranium mono nitride (80 vol. percent). Remaining 10 vol. percent is considered to be consumed by porosity. This study aims at comparison of neutron physics behavior of both these options in LWR environment. The upshot of the study is to quantify the impact of adding layers or secondary phase with respect to pure/complete UN fuel. To study these effects, two theoretical densities i.e. 95% and 80% for UN fuel are chosen for analyses. To avoid the problem of C-14 production from N-14, fuels studied are considered to be having 100% N-15. A validated model of Benchmark for Evaluation and Validation of Reactor Studies (BEAVRS) is used to perform all the analyses. Integral neutron physics parameters like neutron energy spectra, Radial Peaking Factors, Axial Peaking Factor, Doppler coefficient of reactivity, Isothermal Coefficient of reactivity and Temperature defect, Control Rod worth and excess reactivity for whole core are compared at Beginning of Cycle (BoC). Burnup obtained by different fuel option is also compared. Consistent with pin-cell based earlier findings, this full 3D analyses with UN based fuel shows noticeable spectral hardening leading to decrease in the value of control rod worth and less negative Doppler coefficient of reactivity while power peaking factors remain mostly unchanged. The economic advantage of switching to UN based fuels is expected when UN fuel above 80% TD is used. Approximately 19% increase in Equivalent Full Power Days (EFPDs) is witnessed by using 95% TD UN based fuels.