Published January 1, 2011 | Version v1
Miscellaneous

Evaluation of Magnetic Diagnostics for MHD Equilibrium Reconstruction of LHD Discharges

  • 1. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, TN (United States)
  • 2. Auburn University, Auburn, AL (United States)
  • 3. Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, Princeton, NJ (United States)
  • 4. National Institute for Fusion Science, Toki (Japan)

Description

Equilibrium reconstruction is the process of determining the set of parameters of an MHD equilibrium that minimize the difference between expected and experimentally observed signals. This is routinely performed in axisymmetric devices, such as tokamaks, and the reconstructed equilibrium solution is then the basis for analysis of stability and transport properties. The V3FIT code (1) has been developed to perform equilibrium reconstruction in cases where axisymmetry cannot be assumed, such as in stellarators. The present work is focused on using V3FIT to analyze plasmas in the Large Helical Device (LHD) (2), a superconducting, heliotron type device with over 25 MW of heating power that is capable of achieving both high-beta (∼5%) and high density (>1 x 1021/m3). This high performance as well as the ability to drive tens of kiloamperes of toroidal plasma current leads to deviations in the equilibrium state from the vacuum flux surfaces. This initial study examines the effectiveness of using magnetic diagnostics as the observed signals in reconstructing experimental plasma parameters for LHD discharges. V3FIT uses the VMEC (3) 3D equilibrium solver to calculate an initial equilibrium solution with closed, nested flux surfaces based on user specified plasma parameters. This equilibrium solution is then used to calculate the expected signals for specified diagnostics. The differences between these expected signal values and the observed values provides a starting χ2 value. V3FIT then varies all of the fit parameters independently, calculating a new equilibrium and corresponding χ2 for each variation. A quasi-Newton algorithm (1) is used to find the path in parameter space that leads to a minimum in χ2. Effective diagnostic signals must vary in a predictable manner with the variations of the plasma parameters and this signal variation must be of sufficient amplitude to be resolved from the signal noise. Signal effectiveness can be defined for a specific signal and specific reconstruction parameter as the dimensionless fractional reduction in the posterior parameter variance with respect to the signal variance. Here, σisig is the variance of the ith signal and σjparam param is the posterior variance of the jth fit parameter. The sum of all signal effectiveness values for a given reconstruction parameter is normalized to one. This quantity will be used to determine signal effectiveness for various reconstruction cases. The next section will examine the variation of the expected signals with changes in plasma pressure and the following section will show results for reconstructing model plasmas using these signals.

Availability note (English)

Available from Oak Ridge National Laboratory, TN (US)

Additional details

Publishing Information

Imprint Pagination
4 p.

Conference

Title
38. European Physical Society Conference on Plasma Physics
Acronym
EPS 2011
Dates
27 Jun - 1 Jul 2011
Place
Strasbourg (France)

INIS

Country of Publication
United States
Country of Input or Organization
United States
INIS RN
42106998
Subject category
S70: PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY;
Resource subtype / Literary indicator
Conference, Non-conventional Literature
Descriptors DEI
ALGORITHMS; AMPLITUDES; ELECTRIC CURRENTS; EVALUATION; HEATING; HELIOTRON; MAGNETIC SURFACES; MHD EQUILIBRIUM; PERFORMANCE; PLASMA; PLASMA PRESSURE; STABILITY; STELLARATORS
Descriptors DEC
CLOSED PLASMA DEVICES; CURRENTS; EQUILIBRIUM; MAGNETIC FIELD CONFIGURATIONS; MATHEMATICAL LOGIC; THERMONUCLEAR DEVICES

Optional Information

Contract/Grant/Project number
AT5015020; ERAT324; AC05-00OR22725
Funding organization
SC USDOE - Office of Science (United States)