Published May 2013 | Version v1
Journal article

Musculoskeletal MRI at 3.0 T and 7.0 T: A comparison of relaxation times and image contrast

  • 1. Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA (United States)
  • 2. Department of Radiology, The Richard M. Lucas Center for Imaging, Stanford University, Stanford, CA (United States)
  • 3. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT (United States)
  • 4. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA (United States)

Description

Objective: The purpose of this study was to measure and compare the relaxation times of musculoskeletal tissues at 3.0 T and 7.0 T, and to use these measurements to select appropriate parameters for musculoskeletal protocols at 7.0 T. Materials and methods: We measured the T1 and T2 relaxation times of cartilage, muscle, synovial fluid, bone marrow and subcutaneous fat at both 3.0 T and 7.0 T in the knees of five healthy volunteers. The T1 relaxation times were measured using a spin-echo inversion recovery sequence with six inversion times. The T2 relaxation times were measured using a spin-echo sequence with seven echo times. The accuracy of both the T1 and T2 measurement techniques was verified in phantoms at both magnetic field strengths. We used the measured relaxation times to help design 7.0 T musculoskeletal protocols that preserve the favorable contrast characteristics of our 3.0 T protocols, while achieving significantly higher resolution at higher SNR efficiency. Results: The T1 relaxation times in all tissues at 7.0 T were consistently higher than those measured at 3.0 T, while the T2 relaxation times at 7.0 T were consistently lower than those measured at 3.0 T. The measured relaxation times were used to help develop high resolution 7.0 T protocols that had similar fluid-to-cartilage contrast to that of the standard clinical 3.0 T protocols for the following sequences: proton-density-weighted fast spin-echo (FSE), T2-weighted FSE, and 3D-FSE-Cube. Conclusion: The T1 and T2 changes were within the expected ranges. Parameters for musculoskeletal protocols at 7.0 T can be optimized based on these values, yielding improved resolution in musculoskeletal imaging with similar contrast to that of standard 3.0 T clinical protocols

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.09.021

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.09.021;
PII
S0720-048X(11)00776-5;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
European Journal of Radiology
Journal Volume
82
Journal Issue
5
Journal Page Range
p. 734-739
ISSN
0720-048X
CODEN
EJRADR

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2011 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.