Nuclear and sustainable development - A trans-disciplinary approach
Description
Never before in history has society been so thoroughly permeated by Science and Technology in all aspects of human life, ranging from economic progress to warfare, often resulting in huge environmental problems. Nuclear science can easily be seen as an exponent of this evolution. Numerous beneficial technologies for medicine and energy were developed, but mostly against the background of the Cold War culture of military secrecy - thus contaminating the public perception of nuclear technology as a whole from the early beginning. Moreover, these developments were accompanied by the threat of cancer risks. Gradually, the contours of a new societal paradigm seem to materialise, driven by the often cited dynamics of social change: globalisation, the pace of technological change (notably biotechnology and information technology), changing social identities, mistrust in 'big science' and expert systems and often, an alienation from politics. In 'the age of risk', people feel insecure about the future. In this social context of uncertainty, a new concept for policy making at the global and local level has emerged : Sustainable Development. At present, the nuclear expert is struggling with society, and he paradoxically lacks a scientific approach and insight in complex human behaviour and societal interaction. The restoration of trust will require the integration of humanities and social sciences in a transdisciplinary problem solving approach, far beyond the technical dimension. The Belgian Nuclear Research Centre SCK-CEN already built up experience with multidisciplinary projects (e.g. extending the research on nuclear complexity to economics and liability), but in 1998 the board of directors decided to integrate social sciences in a more co-ordinated way. The four existing projects are: Legal Aspects and Liability, Sustainability and Nuclear Development, Transgenerational Ethics related to the Disposal of long-lived Rad waste, and Emergency Communication and Risk Perception. A broadening of scientific analysis and involvement beyond the frontiers of exact sciences will offer better insight in the interaction of nuclear technology in society. Therefore, development of technical solutions should be done in an interactive process with ethical and societal questions, based on insights from social sciences
Files
36033284.pdf
Files
(48.7 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:ad3fe9964b74d267ec9d23af7527c394
|
48.7 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Publishing Information
- Imprint Title
- 13th international workshop on nuclear public information in practice. Transactions
- Imprint Pagination
- 119 p.
- Journal Page Range
- p. 81-82
- Report number
- INIS-XA-C--014
Conference
- Title
- 13. international workshop on nuclear public information in practice
- Acronym
- ENS PIME 2001
- Dates
- 4-7 Feb 2001
- Place
- Evian (France)
INIS
- Country of Publication
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 36033284
- Subject category
- S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY; S22: GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS;
- Resource subtype / Literary indicator
- Conference
- Descriptors DEI
- BELGIAN ORGANIZATIONS; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; EMERGENCY PLANS; LIABILITIES; NUCLEAR INDUSTRY; RADIOACTIVE WASTE STORAGE; REACTOR TECHNOLOGY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOCIO-ECONOMIC FACTORS; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
- Descriptors DEC
- INDUSTRY; INSTITUTIONAL FACTORS; MANAGEMENT; NATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS; RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT; RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT; STORAGE; WASTE MANAGEMENT; WASTE STORAGE