Published August 1988
| Version v1
Journal article
Radioactive waste
Description
In the authors' view, plutonium production, as well as soil dumping of radioactive waste, should halt immediately: the public dangers are simply too high. DOE's de facto outlaw status in complying with environmental laws must also change. EPA should be able to enforce the same standards for DOE as for the private sector. And the only way to ensure that DOE effectively cleans up its wastes is to set up a long-term spending mechanism such as Superfund. Regardless of how these issues are resolved, the radioactive and hazardous material that is the legacy of the nuclear arms race will affect surrounding communities for centuries
Additional details
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Technology Review
- Journal Volume
- 91
- Journal Issue
- 6
- Series
- Technol. Rev.
- Journal Page Range
- 42-51
- ISSN
- 0040-1692
- CODEN
- TEREA
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United States
- Country of Input or Organization
- United States
- INIS RN
- 20049686
- Subject category
- S12: MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE WASTES, AND NON-RADIOACTIVE WASTES FROM NUCLEAR FACILITIES; S61: RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY; S99: GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS;
- Descriptors DEI
- COST; ECONOMICS; HEALTH HAZARDS; NUCLEAR WEAPONS; PLUTONIUM; PRODUCTION; PUBLIC HEALTH; RADIOACTIVE WASTE DISPOSAL; RADIOACTIVE WASTES; REGULATIONS; UNDERGROUND DISPOSAL; US DOE; US EPA
- Descriptors DEC
- ACTINIDES; ELEMENTS; HAZARDS; LAW; MANAGEMENT; MATERIALS; MEDICINE; METALS; NATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS; PREVENTIVE MEDICINE; RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS; TRANSURANIUM ELEMENTS; US ORGANIZATIONS; WASTE DISPOSAL; WASTE MANAGEMENT; WASTES