Published June 2014 | Version v1
Journal article

Phase II trial of sorafenib and erlotinib in advanced pancreatic cancer

  • 1. Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville,Tennessee (United States)
  • 2. Department of Applied Mathematics, National Chiayi University, Chiayi City,Taiwan (China)
  • 3. Vanderbilt Center for Qualitative Sciences, Nashville,Tennessee (United States)
  • 4. Purchase Cancer Group, Paducah,Kentucky (United States)
  • 5. Tennessee Cancer Specialists, Knoxville,Tennessee (United States)
  • 6. University Oncology/Hematology Associates, Chattanooga,Tennessee (United States)
  • 7. Biodesix, Boulder,Colorado (United States)

Description

This trial was designed to assess efficacy and safety of erlotinib with sorafenib in the treatment of patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. An exploratory correlative study analyzing pretreatment serum samples using a multivariate protein mass spectrometry-based test (VeriStrat®), previously shown to correlate with outcomes in lung cancer patients treated with erlotinib, was performed. Patients received sorafenib 400 mg daily along with erlotinib 150 mg daily with a primary endpoint of 8-week progression free survival (PFS) rate. Pretreatment serum sample analysis by VeriStrat was done blinded to clinical and outcome data; the endpoints were PFS and overall survival (OS). Difference between groups (by VeriStrat classification) was assessed using log-rank P values; hazard ratios (HR) were obtained from Cox proportional hazards model. Thirty-six patients received study drug and were included in the survival analysis. Eight-week PFS rate of 46% (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.32–0.67) did not meet the primary endpoint of a rate ≥70%. Thirty-two patients were included in the correlative analysis, and VeriStrat "Good" patients had superior PFS (HR = 0.18, 95% CI: 0.06–0.57; P = 0.001) and OS (HR = 0.31 95% CI: 0.13–0.77, P = 0.008) compared to VeriStrat "Poor" patients. Grade 3 toxicities of this regimen included fever, anemia, diarrhea, dehydration, rash, and altered liver function. This study did not meet the primary endpoint, and this combination will not be further pursued. In this small retrospective analysis, the proteomic classification was significantly associated with clinical outcomes and is being further evaluated in ongoing studies

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.208; Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4101748

Additional details

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Cancer medicine
Journal Volume
3
Journal Issue
3
Journal Page Range
p. 572-579
ISSN
2045-7634

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
46049524
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
CARCINOMAS; CLASSIFICATION; DEHYDRATION; DIARRHEA; DRUGS; FEVER; HAZARDS; LIVER; LUNGS; MASS SPECTROSCOPY; PATIENTS; PROTEINS; SAFETY; TOXICITY
Descriptors DEC
BODY; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM; DISEASES; GLANDS; NEOPLASMS; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; ORGANS; RESPIRATORY SYSTEM; SPECTROSCOPY; SYMPTOMS

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2014 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Notes
PMCID: PMC4101748; PMID: 24574334; OAI: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:4101748