Effects of water-saving irrigation on the residues and risk of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon in paddy field
- 1. State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008 (China)
- 2. Key Laboratory of Integrated Regulation and Resource Development on Shallow Lake of Ministry of Education, College of Environment, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098 (China)
- 3. Nanjing Institute of Industry Technology, Nanjing 210016 (China)
- 4. College of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095 (China)
Description
Highlights: • Water-saving effectively reduced the leaching quantity of PAHs into groundwater. • Soil risk of PAHs was reduced up to 55%–73% by water-saving vs. flooding irrigation. • Rice carcinogenic risk of PAHs was reduced up to 30–45% by water-saving. • Total Toxic Equivalency Concentration of PAHs in rice grain was reduced about 50%. • This is related to the change of paddy field environment due to moisture control. The effects of different water-saving modes on PAHs residue and risk, field environment conditions and enzyme activities in paddy field were investigated in a field experiment plot in Laoyaba, Nanjing, China. Results showed that (1) water-saving treatment affected greatly the ΣPAHs in water and soil. The order of ΣPAHs residue in surface water and groundwater in farmland is as follows: dry fields < water-saving paddy field < flooding irrigation paddy field. The ΣPAHs in water during rice tillering stage were obviously higher than that in rice booting stage and milky stage, and the percentage of high-ring PAHs gradually reduced in water. (2) The residue of ΣPAHs in soil in flooding irrigation paddy field (534.4 ± 186.7 ng/g) were more than water-saving irrigation (454.3 ± 128.1 ng/g) and dry cultivation paddy field (430.2 ± 143.4 ng/g), and the ΣPAHs in dry field gradually decreased with the increase of water furrow number in farm. (3) When compared with flooding irrigation (337.87 ng/g), water-saving (228.39 ng/g) and dry cultivation (206.62 ng/g) could obviously decrease the residue of ΣPAHs in rice tissues (35%–55%), generally the concentration of ΣPAHs in leaf > root > stem > rice grain. (4) Water-saving irrigation evidently decreased soil ecological risk (up to 55%–73%) and rice carcinogenic risk (up to 30%–45%) caused by PAHs compared with flooding irrigation. Water-saving irrigation could also reduce the Total Toxic Equivalency Concentration of PAHs in rice grain up to 50% relative to flooding irrigation. (5) The significant negative correlations were observed between the residual PAHs and the activities of laccase and dioxygenase (p < 0.019), and the physical and chemical indexes (temperature, redox potential and dissolved oxygen of field, p < 0.041). The changes of field environment conditions and enzyme activities induced by moisture control may be the main key factors affecting PAHs residue in water, soil and rice.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.096Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.096;
- PII
- S0048969717320946;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Science of the Total Environment
- Journal Volume
- 618
- Journal Page Range
- p. 736-745
- ISSN
- 0048-9697
- CODEN
- STENDL
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Netherlands
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 53014281
- Subject category
- S54: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES;
- Descriptors DEI
- CHINA; CULTIVATION; DISSOLVED GASES; ECOLOGICAL CONCENTRATION; ENZYME ACTIVITY; FARMS; GROUND WATER; HAZARDS; IRRIGATION; LEACHING; LEAVES; MOISTURE; OXYGEN; PLANT TISSUES; POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS; REDOX POTENTIAL; RICE; ROOTS; SOILS; TOXICITY
- Descriptors DEC
- AROMATICS; ASIA; CEREALS; DISSOLUTION; ELEMENTS; FLUIDS; GASES; GRAMINEAE; HYDROCARBONS; HYDROGEN COMPOUNDS; LILIOPSIDA; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; NONMETALS; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; OXYGEN COMPOUNDS; PLANTS; SEPARATION PROCESSES; SOLUTES; WATER
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2017 Published by Elsevier B.V.