Pathways to Mexico's climate change mitigation targets: A multi-model analysis
Creators
- 1. Stockholm Environment Institute, 11 Curtis Avenue, Somerville, MA 02144 (United States)
- 2. Mario Molina Center for Strategic Studies on Energy and the Environment (Mexico)
- 3. Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, MA Institute of Technology (United States)
- 4. Joint Global Change Research Institute, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory/University of Maryland, 5825 University Research Ct, Suite 3500, College Park, MD 20740 (United States)
- 5. Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 2, NL-3584 CS Utrecht (Netherlands)
- 6. European Commission, DG Joint Research Centre (JRC), Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS), Unit J1 - Economics of Climate Change, Energy and Transport, Edificio Expo, C/ Inca Garcilaso, 3 E-41092 Sevilla (Spain)
- 7. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, USEPA Headquarters, William Jefferson Clinton Building, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W., Mail Code: 6207A, Washington, DC 20460 United States (United States)
- 8. University of Amsterdam, Faculty of Science, Amsterdam (Netherlands)
- 9. Johns Hopkins University, School of Advanced International Studies, Bologna (Italy)
- 10. Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands (ECN), Policy Studies, Radarweg 60, 1043 NT, Amsterdam (Netherlands)
Description
Mexico's climate policy sets ambitious national greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction targets—30% versus a business-as-usual baseline by 2020, 50% versus 2000 by 2050. However, these goals are at odds with recent energy and emission trends in the country. Both energy use and GHG emissions in Mexico have grown substantially over the last two decades. We investigate how Mexico might reverse current trends and reach its mitigation targets by exploring results from energy system and economic models involved in the CLIMACAP-LAMP project. To meet Mexico's emission reduction targets, all modeling groups agree that decarbonization of electricity is needed, along with changes in the transport sector, either to more efficient vehicles or a combination of more efficient vehicles and lower carbon fuels. These measures reduce GHG emissions as well as emissions of other air pollutants. The models find different energy supply pathways, with some solutions based on renewable energy and others relying on biomass or fossil fuels with carbon capture and storage. The economy-wide costs of deep mitigation could range from 2% to 4% of GDP in 2030, and from 7% to 15% of GDP in 2050. Our results suggest that Mexico has some flexibility in designing deep mitigation strategies, and that technological options could allow Mexico to achieve its emission reduction targets, albeit at a cost to the country. - Highlights: • We explore paths to deep mitigation for Mexico (50% cut in GHG emissions by 2050). • We present results from six models and compare them with Mexican climate policy. • We find a range of potential paths and costs, implying options for policy makers. • An important commonality between the paths is a decarbonized electricity supply. • Estimated mitigation costs vary but are higher than official published estimates.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.04.011Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.eneco.2015.04.011;
- PII
- S0140-9883(15)00134-6;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Energy Economics
- Journal Volume
- 56
- Journal Page Range
- p. 587-599
- ISSN
- 0140-9883
- CODEN
- EECODR
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 48002700
- Subject category
- S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
- Descriptors DEI
- AIR POLLUTION; AIR POLLUTION ABATEMENT; BIOMASS; CARBON; CLIMATES; CLIMATIC CHANGE; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; DECARBONIZATION; ECONOMY; ELECTRICITY; ENERGY CONSUMPTION; ENERGY POLICY; ENERGY SYSTEMS; FLEXIBILITY; FOSSIL FUELS; GREENHOUSE GASES; GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT; MEXICO; MITIGATION
- Descriptors DEC
- DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; ELEMENTS; ENERGY SOURCES; EVALUATION; FUELS; GOVERNMENT POLICIES; LATIN AMERICA; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; NONMETALS; NORTH AMERICA; POLLUTION; POLLUTION ABATEMENT; RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES; TENSILE PROPERTIES
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2016 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.