Published September 2002 | Version v1
Journal article

Assessment of relative individual renal function based on DMSA uptake corrected for renal size

  • 1. Department of Nuclear Medicine of the Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau of Barcelona, Barcelona (Spain)
  • 2. Deicon Imatge Medica, Barcelona (Spain)

Description

Decreased relative renal DMSA uptake can be a consequence of abnormal kidney size, associated with normal or impaired renal function. The quantification of relative renal function based on DMSA uptake in both kidneys is an established method for the assessment of individual renal function. Aim: To assess relative renal function by means of quantification of renal DMSA uptake corrected for kidney size. Results were compared with relative renal DMSA uptake without size correction, and were validated against the absolute renal DMSA uptake. Material and Methods: Four-hundred-forty-four consecutive patients (147 adults, mean age 14 years) underwent a DMSA study for several renal diseases. The relative renal function, based on the relative DMSA uptake uncorrected and corrected for renal size, and the absolute renal DMSA uptake were calculated. In order to relate the relative DMSA uptake uncorrected and corrected for renal size with the absolute DMSA uptake, subtraction of uncorrected (SU) and corrected (SC) relative uptake percentages of each pair of kidneys was obtained, and these values were correlated to the matched subtraction percentages of absolute uptake (SA). If the individual relative renal function is normal (45%-55%), the subtraction value is less or equal to 10%. Results: In 227 patients (51%) the relative renal DMSA uptake value was normal either uncorrected or corrected for renal size (A), and in 149 patients (34%) it was abnormal by both quantification methods (B). Seventy-seven patients (15%) had the relative renal DMSA uptake abnormal only by the uncorrected method (C). Subtraction value of absolute DMSA uptake percentages was not significantly different of subtraction value of relative DMSA uptake percentages corrected for renal size when relative uncorrected uptake was abnormal and corrected normal. where * p<0.0001, and p=NS. Conclusion: When uncorrected and corrected relative DMSA uptake are abnormal, the absolute uptake is also impaired, while when only uncorrected relative DMSA uptake is abnormal, the relative DMSA uptake corrected for kidney size is not significantly different of the absolute uptake value. These findings indicate that quantification with correction for kidney size is more accurate than uncorrected quantification, reflecting the true condition of renal parenchyma

Additional details

Publishing Information

Journal Title
World Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Journal Volume
1
Journal Issue
suppl.2
Journal Page Range
p. 244
ISSN
1450-1147

Conference

Title
8. Congress of the World Federation of Nuclear Medicine and Biology
Dates
29 Sep - 2 Oct 2002
Place
Santiago (Chile)

INIS

Country of Publication
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
34038591
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Resource subtype / Literary indicator
Conference
Descriptors DEI
DMSO; KIDNEYS; RENAL CLEARANCE; UPTAKE; UROGENITAL SYSTEM DISEASES
Descriptors DEC
BODY; CLEARANCE; DISEASES; EXCRETION; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; ORGANIC SULFUR COMPOUNDS; ORGANS; SULFOXIDES

Optional Information

Notes
1 tab