Modelling population-level consequences of chronic external gamma irradiation in aquatic invertebrates under laboratory conditions
Creators
- 1. Laboratoire de modélisation pour l'expertise environnementale (LM2E) Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), PRP-ENV, SERIS, Cadarache (France)
- 2. Laboratoire d'écotoxicologie des radionucléides (LECO) Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), PRP-ENV, SERIS, Cadarache (France)
- 3. Laboratoire de biogéochimie, biodisponibilité et transferts des radionucléides (L2BT) Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), PRP-ENV, SERIS, Cadarache (France)
Description
We modelled population-level consequences of chronic external gamma irradiation in aquatic invertebrates under laboratory conditions. We used Leslie matrices to combine life-history characteristics (duration of life stages, survival and fecundity rates) and dose rate-response curves for hatching, survival and reproduction fitted on effect data from the FREDERICA database. Changes in net reproductive rate R0 (offspring per individual) and asymptotic population growth rate λ (dimensionless) were calculated over a range of dose rates in two marine polychaetes (Neanthes arenaceodentata and Ophryotrocha diadema) and a freshwater gastropod (Physa heterostropha). Sensitivities in R0 and λ to changes in life-history traits were analysed in each species. Results showed that fecundity has the strongest influence on R0. A delay in age at first reproduction is most critical for λ independent of the species. Fast growing species were proportionally more sensitive to changes in individual endpoints than slow growing species. Reduction of 10% in population λ were predicted at dose rates of 6918, 5012 and 74,131 μGy·h−1 in N. arenaceodentata, O. diadema and P. heterostropha respectively, resulting from a combination of strong effects on several individual endpoints in each species. These observations made 10%-reduction in λ a poor criterion for population protection. The lowest significant changes in R0 and λ were respectively predicted at a same dose rate of 1412 μGy h−1 in N. arenaceodentata, at 760 and 716 μGy h−1 in O. diadema and at 12,767 and 13,759 μGy h−1 in P. heterostropha. These values resulted from a combination of slight but significant changes in several measured endpoints and were lower than effective dose rates calculated for the individual level in O. diadema and P. heterostropha. The relevance of the experimental dataset (external irradiation rather than contamination, exposure over one generation only, effects on survival and reproduction only) for predicting population responses was discussed. - Highlights: ► We model population effects of chronic gamma radiation in aquatic invertebrates. ► We combine effects on hatching, fecundity and survival using species Leslie matrices. ► Population effects vary among individual endpoints and life history strategies. ► Population can be more radiosensitive than the most sensitive individual endpoint.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.03.078Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.03.078;
- PII
- S0048-9697(12)00482-2;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Science of the Total Environment
- Journal Volume
- 429
- Journal Page Range
- p. 206-214
- ISSN
- 0048-9697
- CODEN
- STENDL
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Netherlands
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 44116139
- Subject category
- S63: RADIATION, THERMAL, AND OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTANT EFFECTS ON LIVING ORGANISMS AND BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS; S54: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES;
- Descriptors DEI
- BIOLOGICAL RADIATION EFFECTS; CHRONIC EXPOSURE; CONTAMINATION; DOSE RATES; EXTERNAL IRRADIATION; FRESH WATER; GAMMA RADIATION; HATCHING; INVERTEBRATES; REPRODUCTION
- Descriptors DEC
- ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS; ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION; HYDROGEN COMPOUNDS; IONIZING RADIATIONS; IRRADIATION; OXYGEN COMPOUNDS; RADIATION EFFECTS; RADIATIONS; WATER
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2012 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.