Published October 2011 | Version v1
Journal article

Factors influencing the uptake of 18F-fluoroestradiol in patients with estrogen receptor positive breast cancer

  • 1. Department of Radiology, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle WA (United States)
  • 2. Department of Radiology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle WA (United States)
  • 3. Clinical Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA (United States)
  • 4. Department of Medical Oncology, University of Washington Medical Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA (United States)

Description

Introduction: 18F-Fluoroestradiol (FES) PET imaging provides a non-invasive method to measure estrogen receptor (ER) expression in tumors. Assessment of factors that could affect the quantitative level of FES uptake is important as part of the validation of FES PET for evaluating regional ER expression in breast cancer. Methods: This study examines FES uptake in tumors from 312 FES PET scans (239 patients) with documented ER+ primary breast cancer. FES uptake was compared to clinical and laboratory data, treatment prior to or at time of scan, and properties of FES and its metabolism and transport. Linear mixed models were used to explore univariate, threshold-based and multivariate associations. Results: Sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) was inversely associated with FES SUV. Average FES uptake did not differ by levels of plasma estradiol, age or rate of FES metabolism. FES tumor uptake was greater for patients with a higher body mass index (BMI), but this effect did not persist when SUV was corrected for lean body mass (LBM). In multivariate analysis, only plasma SHBG binding was an independent predictor of LBM-adjusted FES SUV. Conclusions: Calculation of FES SUV, possibly adjusted for LBM, should be sufficient to assess FES uptake for the purpose of inferring ER expression. Pre-menopausal estradiol levels do not appear to interfere with FES uptake. The availability and binding properties of SHBG influence FES uptake and should be measured. Specific activity did not have a clear influence on FES uptake, except perhaps at higher injected mass per kilogram. These results suggest that FES imaging protocols may be simplified without sacrificing the validity of the results.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2011.03.002

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2011.03.002;
PII
S0969-8051(11)00057-6;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Nuclear Medicine and Biology
Journal Volume
38
Journal Issue
7
Journal Page Range
p. 969-978
ISSN
0969-8051
CODEN
NMBIEO

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2011 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.