Published 1980 | Version v1
Book

LWR recycle--economic at what price U3O8

  • 1. Sargent and Lundy

Description

The Department of Energy has suggested that the Presidential decision to delay reprocessing is also an economic one. To test this hypothesis, a detailed economic analysis is currently being conducted by the Subcommittee on Financing the Nuclear Fuel Cycle of the Atomic Industrial Forum Committee on Financial Considerations. Two cycles studied for their economic impacts are illustrated. The first is the traditional closed fuel cycle upon which the nuclear power industry has based its planning. The second is the throwaway cycle or an open cycle which does not utilize the residual uranium and plutonium values contained in the spent nuclear fuel leaving power reactors. Instead, the fuel is stored and cooled at the reactor site and/or at an intermediary site prior to ultimate disposal in a waste repository. 28 refs

Additional details

Publishing Information

Publisher
Atomic Industrial Forum, Inc.
Imprint Place
Bethesda, MD
Imprint Title
Atomic Industrial Forum, Inc., fuel cycle conference, 1980
Journal Page Range
p. vp.

Conference

Title
Fuel cycle conference.
Dates
15 - 18 Apr 1980.
Place
New Orleans, LA, USA.

INIS

Country of Publication
United States
Country of Input or Organization
United States
INIS RN
12642675
Subject category
S11: NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS;
Resource subtype / Literary indicator
Conference
Descriptors DEI
BWR TYPE REACTORS; ECONOMICS; FUEL CYCLE; PWR TYPE REACTORS; REPROCESSING; SPENT FUELS; U3O8
Descriptors DEC
ACTINIDE COMPOUNDS; CHALCOGENIDES; ENERGY SOURCES; FUELS; NUCLEAR FUELS; OXIDES; OXYGEN COMPOUNDS; REACTOR MATERIALS; REACTORS; SEPARATION PROCESSES; URANIUM COMPOUNDS; URANIUM OXIDES; WATER COOLED REACTORS; WATER MODERATED REACTORS