Published June 2019 | Version v1
Journal article

Impact of gate closure time on the efficiency of power systems balancing

  • 1. Chaire European Electricity Markets, Paris-Dauphine University, Place du Maréchal de Lettre de Tassigny, 75775, Paris Cedex 16 (France)
  • 2. EDF R&D, Lab Paris-Saclay, 7 Boulevard Gaspard Monge, 91120, Palaiseau (France)
  • 3. University of Liège, Quartier Polytech, Sart-Tilman, B-4020 Liège (Belgium)

Description

Highlights: • This paper investigates the most relevant timing for the balancing gate closure. • Simulations are carried out with a multi-level simulation tool. • A balancing gate closure time of 1 h provides a lower operational cost. • The difference is explained by a better coordination of the available resources. -- Abstract: This paper focuses on market design options for operational balancing management in self-dispatch electric power systems. In particular, it investigates the most relevant timing for the balancing gate closure, when competitors' decisions on the setting of controllable assets are neutralized and this responsibility is simultaneously transferred to the system operator. This discussion is central in the development and implementation of the European Electricity Balancing Guideline. Based on a multi-level simulation tool with a realistic modelling of short-term power system operations, this paper proposes the first quantitative assessment of postponing the balancing gate closure time from 1 h to 15 min ahead of the imbalance settlement period. For different environments (energy mix, power plant capabilities, outages, etc), the results highlight that postponing the balancing gate closure time from 1 h to 15 min increases the operational cost of the system. Based on robust and scalable results, we show that this difference is mainly due to a better coordination of the available resources by the central decision maker.

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.enpol.2019.02.039;
PII
S0301421519301223;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Energy Policy
Journal Volume
129
Journal Page Range
p. 562-573
ISSN
0301-4215
CODEN
ENPYAC

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
55007390
Subject category
S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
Descriptors DEI
COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION; DESIGN; ELECTRIC POWER; ELECTRICITY; MARKET; OPERATING COST; OUTAGES; POWER PLANTS; POWER SYSTEMS; RECOMMENDATIONS
Descriptors DEC
COST; ENERGY SYSTEMS; POWER; SIMULATION

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.