There is a newer version of the record available.

Published 2022 | Version v1
Journal article

Treatment of chronic lateral epicondylosis: a randomized trial comparing the efficacy of ultrasound-guided tendon dry needling and open-release surgery

  • 1. Research Center, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), 900 rue Saint-Denis, Montreal, H2X 0A9, Quebec (Canada)
  • 2. Department of Radiology, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), 1000 rue Saint-Denis, Montreal, H2X 0C1, Quebec (Canada)
  • 3. Department of Orthopedics, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), 1000 rue Saint-Denis, Montreal, H2X 0C1, Quebec (Canada)
  • 4. Research Center, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont (HMR), 5415 Blvd L'Assomption, Montreal, H1T 2M4, Quebec (Canada)
  • 5. Department of Mathematics and Statistic, Université Laval, 1045 avenue de la Médecine, Quebec City, G1V 0A6, Quebec (Canada)
  • 6. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Université de Montréal, C.P. 6128, succursale Centre-ville, Montreal, H3C 3J7, Quebec (Canada)

Description

Evaluate the efficacy of ultrasound-guided dry needling and open-release surgery in reducing pain and improving function in workers with lateral epicondylosis refractory to at least 6 months of nonsurgical management. We randomly assigned participants in a 1:1 ratio to receive dry needling or surgery. The primary outcome was the Patient Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) score at 6 months. Secondary outcome measures examined the impact of these techniques on professional activity, grip strength, and Global Rating of Change and Satisfaction scales. Statistical analyses included mixed-effects models and Fisher's exact tests. From October 2016 through June 2019, we enrolled 64 participants. Two participants were excluded, and data from 62 participants (48 ± 8 years, 33 men) with a mean duration of symptoms of 23 ± 21 months were analyzed. Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. In the intention-to-treat analysis, no treatment-by-time interaction was observed (F(4,201) = 0.72; p = .58). The least-squares mean difference from baseline in PRTEE scores at 6 months was 33.4 (CI 25.2 - 41.5) in the surgery group and 26.9 (CI 19.4 - 34.4) in the dry needling group (p = .25). The proportion of successful treatment was 83% (CI 63 - 95%) and 81% (CI 63 - 93%) in the surgery and dry needling groups, respectively (p = 1.00). Changes in secondary outcomes were in the same direction as those of the primary outcome. No adverse event occurred. Ultrasound-guided dry needling resulted in comparable improvement in outcome scores on scales of pain, physical function, and global assessment of change and satisfaction than open-release surgery. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT 02710682: In patients with chronic lateral epicondylosis, ultrasound-guided tendon dry needling provides comparable therapeutic efficacy to open-release surgery. Ultrasound-guided tendon dry needling allows for an earlier return to work and may be less costly than open-release surgery. Care management guidelines should recommend treatment by ultrasound-guided tendon dry needling before open-release surgery.

Availability note (English)

Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08794-4

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
European Radiology (Internet)
Journal Volume
32
Journal Issue
11
Journal Page Range
p. 7612-7622
ISSN
1432-1084
CODEN
EURAE3