Published August 2011 | Version v1
Journal article

The efficiency of 18F-FDG PET for glioma grading: a Meta-analysis

  • 1. Department of Radiology, Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang (China)

Description

Objective: To systematically review the efficiency of 18F-FDG PET in glioma grading by using Meta-analysis. Methods: Retrieval in PubMed and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) was performed. Relevant papers concerning with glioma diagnoses with 18F- FDG PET were selected. Paper quality was evaluated according to the standard of diagnostic test recommended by Cochrane Workshop. The data of glioma malignancy degree defined as semi-quantitatively and qualitatively were extracted from the papers. Meta-analysis was conducted with the Meta-Disc software to calculate pooled weighted sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence interval (CI). Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was performed and the areas under the curve (AUC) were calculated. Results: Seven hundred and fifty-three patients from 17 papers (16 in English, 1 in Chinese) were included. Two hundred and seventy-two patients from 11 papers were using semi-quantitative (tumor to cortex ratio, T/C; tumor to white matter ratio, T/W) method and 481 patients from 9 papers were using qualitative method (visual observation, some of the papers had 2 or more methods). After heterogeneity test was done, different effect models were selected. The pooled weighted sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) with 95% CI for T/C group was 0.952 (95% CI: 0.903-0.980), 0.409 (95% CI: 0.318-0.504) and 11. 746 (95% CI: 5.368-25.702) respectively. The pooled weighted sensitivity, specificity and DOR with 95% CI for T/W group was 0. 857 (95% CI: 0.768-0.922), 0.538 (95% CI: 0.431-0.642) and 22. 066 (95% CI:7.077-68.800) respectively. The pooled weighted sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) with 95% CI for qualitative method was 0.810 (95% CI: 0.757-0.855), 0.870 (95% CI: 0.819-0.911) and 15.282 (95% CI: 3.716-62.851) respectively. The AUC for T/C group, T/W group and qualitative method was 0.8604, 0.8373 and 0.8724 respectively. Conclusions: Grading glioma by 18F-FDG PET with semi-quantitative method may provide high diagnostic sensitivity. If qualitative method is used, the diagnostic specificity may be higher. (authors)

Additional details

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Chinese Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Journal Volume
31
Journal Issue
4
Journal Page Range
p. 267-271
ISSN
0253-9780

Optional Information

Notes
1 figs., 5 tabs., 26 refs.