Published February 1, 2012 | Version v1
Journal article

Declining Use of Radiotherapy in Stage I and II Hodgkin's Disease and Its Effect on Survival and Secondary Malignancies

  • 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL (United States)
  • 2. Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL (United States)
  • 3. Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (United States)
  • 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (United States)

Description

Purpose: Concerns regarding long-term toxicities have led some to withhold radiotherapy (RT) for the treatment of Stage I and II Hodgkin's disease (HD). The present study was undertaken to assess the use of RT for HD and its effect on overall survival and the development of secondary malignancies. Methods and Materials: The present study included data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from patients aged ≥20 years who had been diagnosed with Stage I or II HD between 1988 and 2006. Overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the Cox multivariate regression model was used to analyze trends. Results: A total of 12,247 patients were selected, and 51.5% had received RT. The median follow-up for the present cohort was 4.9 years, with 21% of the cohort having >10 years of follow-up. Between 1988 and 1991, 62.9% had undergone RT, but between 2004 and 2006, only 43.7% had undergone RT (p < .001). The 5-year overall survival rate was 76% for patients who had not received RT and 87% for those who had (p < .001). The hazard ratio adjusted for other variables in the regression model showed that patients who had not undergone RT (hazard ratio, 1.72; 95% confidence interval, 1.72–2.02) was associated with significantly worse survival compared with patients who had received RT. The actuarial rate of developing a second malignancy was 14.6% vs. 15.0% at 15 years for those who had and had not undergone RT, respectively (p = .089). Conclusions: The present study is one of the largest studies to examine the role of RT for Stage I and II HD. Our results revealed a survival benefit with the addition of RT with no increase in the development of secondary malignancies compared with patients who had not received RT. Furthermore, the present nationwide study revealed a >20% absolute decrease in the use of RT from 1988 to 2006.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.10.069

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.10.069;
PII
S0360-3016(10)03643-6;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics
Journal Volume
82
Journal Issue
2
Journal Page Range
p. 619-625
ISSN
0360-3016
CODEN
IOBPD3

INIS

Country of Publication
United States
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
44016384
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
ELDERLY PEOPLE; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HAZARDS; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEOPLASMS; PATIENTS; RADIOTHERAPY; TOXICITY
Descriptors DEC
ADULTS; AGE GROUPS; AGED ADULTS; ANIMALS; DISEASES; HUMAN POPULATIONS; MAMMALS; MAN; MATHEMATICS; MEDICINE; MINORITY GROUPS; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; POPULATIONS; PRIMATES; RADIOLOGY; STATISTICS; THERAPY; VERTEBRATES

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2012 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.