Published 2008 | Version v1
Miscellaneous

A Proposed Framework For Planning Deactivation And Decommissioning Engineering And Design Activities To Meet The Requirements Of DOE Order 413.3A, Program And Project Management For The Acquisition Of Capital Assets

  • 1. Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL), Savannah River Site, Aiken, SC (United States)
  • 2. United States Department of Energy (DOE), Washington, DC (United States)
  • 3. Project Enhancement Corporation, Germantown, MD (United States)

Description

This paper applies the DOE O 413.3A Design/Engineering requirements to Deactivation and Decommissioning (D and D) projects. A list of 41 activities for which Design/Engineering is generally required and which are relevant and common to many D and D projects was generated. For several activities in this list, examples of the level of development and/or types of deliverables that might be expected at the completion of the conceptual, preliminary and final project design phases described in the Order are provided. This paper also discusses tailoring the application of the Order to a facility based on the complexity of the facility's engineered systems and the hazards existing in the facility. DOE D and D projects are expected to meet the requirements of DOE O 413.3A. For D and D engineering and design activities only, this paper provides guidance for applying these requirements to the Order. A list of 41 typical D and D engineering and design activities has been provided. The Order divides projects into conceptual, preliminary and final design phases. Development of each of the 41 activities can also be organized in conceptual, preliminary and final levels. In general, at the conceptual level project engineers should be determining the what (i.e., the scope) for each activity. At the preliminary level they should be resolving how the activity will be accomplished. At the final level, all the engineering and design details for the activity should be completed so that the activity is ready to implement in the field. It may not be appropriate that development of each individual activity correspond to the current phase of the project. For example, at CD-2 (end of the preliminary design phase) not all activities need be developed to the same level of detail. Only those that are truly significant to the project baseline must be developed to the level of detail necessary to create a reliable project baseline. (authors)

Availability note (English)

Available from: WM Symposia, 1628 E. Southern Avenue, Suite 9 - 332, Tempe, AZ 85282 (US); also available online at: http://www.wmsym.org/archives/2008/search.html

Additional details

Publishing Information

Imprint Pagination
13 p.
Report number
INIS-US--10-WM-08134

Conference

Title
Waste Management Symposium 2008 - HLW, TRU, LLW/ILW, Mixed, Hazardous Wastes and Environmental Management - Phoenix Rising: Moving Forward in Waste Management
Acronym
WM'08
Dates
24-28 Feb 2008
Place
Phoenix, AZ (United States)

INIS

Country of Publication
United States
Country of Input or Organization
France
INIS RN
41064289
Subject category
S21: SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS; S42: ENGINEERING;
Resource subtype / Literary indicator
Conference, Non-conventional Literature, Numerical Data
Descriptors DEI
DEACTIVATION; DECOMMISSIONING; DESIGN; ENGINEERING; FINANCIAL DATA; HAZARDS; PLANNING; PROGRAM MANAGEMENT
Descriptors DEC
DATA; INFORMATION; MANAGEMENT; NUMERICAL DATA