Published September 2015 | Version v1
Journal article

Intra-voxel incoherent motion parameters of rectal cancer at 3.0 T MRI: effect of region of interest on measurement consistency of parameters

  • 1. Department of Radiology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing (China)

Description

Objective: To determine the measurement consistency of diffusion coefficient D, perfusion fraction f and pseudodiffusion coefficient D* in rectal cancers based on different ROIs. Methods: Forty-three patients with histologically proven rectal cancers were examined using echo-planar DW-MRI with eight b values (0 to 1000 s/mm2). Intravoxel incoherent motion parameters were measured on intravoxel incoherent motion map that contained the largest tumor cross-section, according to two distinct ROI protocols: freehand outline ROI and semi-automatic tumor center ROI. The two protocols were compared for differences in IVIM parameters and the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were also calculated. intra-and inter-observer variability using paired t test and Bland-Altman plot. Results: The IVIM parameters(D, f and D*) obtained by ROIs for outlined and center analysis were (1.08 ± 0.24) × 10-3 mm2/s, (0.16 ± 0.06), (26.59 ± 19.54) × 10-3 mm2/s and (1.06 ± 0.27) × 10-3 mm2/s, (0.17 ± 0.07), (30.79 ± 20.85) × 10-3 mm2/s, respectively. No significant differences were observed between the means of the IVIM parameters (D, f, D*) calculated by the two methods (t = 1.113, -0.259, -1.660; P = 0.272, 0.797, 0.104, respectively), and the relative ICC were 0.863, 0.469, 0.663, respectively. The intra-observer 95% limits of consistency of IVIM parameters were (-0.012-0.038) × 10-3 mm2/s, (-0.003-0.007), (-0.923-1.166) × 10-3 mm2/s with ROI outline tumor, respectively; (-0.024-0.044) × 10-3 mm2/s, (-0.005-0.015), (-1.670-4.195) × 10-3 mm2/s with center ROI, respectively. The inter-observer 95% limits of consistency of perfusion parameters were (-0.047-0.009) × 10-3 mm2/s, (-0.015-0.009), (-7.206-3.190) × 10-3 mm2/s with ROI outlined tumor, respectively; (-0.068-0.048) × 10-3 mm2/s, (-0.005-0.041), (-17.657-0.779) × 10-3 mm2/s with center ROI, respectively. Conclusions: There was no statistically significant difference between the outlined ROI and tumor center ROI analysis of rectal cancers' IVIM parameters. The tumor analysis by outlined ROI protocol appropriately improves intra- and inter-observer consistency and can provide more reproducible and stable results. (authors)

Additional details

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Chinese Journal of Radiology
Journal Volume
49
Journal Issue
9
Journal Page Range
p. 651-655
ISSN
1005-1201

INIS

Country of Publication
China
Country of Input or Organization
China
INIS RN
52076212
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; CORRELATIONS; DIFFUSION; MAPS; NEOPLASMS; NMR IMAGING; PATIENTS; RECTUM
Descriptors DEC
BODY; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM; DISEASES; EVALUATION; GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT; INTESTINES; LARGE INTESTINE; ORGANS

Optional Information

Notes
7 figs., 3 tabs., 14 refs.; http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-1201.2015.09.003