Quality of life in patients with limited (1–3) brain metastases undergoing stereotactic or whole brain radiotherapy. A prospective study of the DEGRO QoL working group
Creators
- 1. Department of Radiotherapy and Special Oncology, Medical School Hannover (Germany)
- 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale) (Germany)
- 3. Department for Dermatology and Allergology, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin (Germany)
Description
Published results of quality of life (QoL) studies mostly concern whole brain radiotherapy for limited or multiple brain metastases. This prospective multicentre study was designed to compare the QoL of patients with limited (1–3) brain metastases treated with either whole brain (WBRT) or stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT). Methods From 01/2007–03/2011, 90 limited brain metastases patients who were previously untreated (n = 77) or had undergone primary surgery (n = 13) were recruited at 14 centres in Germany and Austria. QoL was measured with the EORTC-QLQ-C15-PAL and BN20 brain modules before the start of radiotherapy and after 3 months. Results Fifty-two patients (58%) received WBRT and 38 (42%) received SRT. At 3 months, 67 patients (74%) were still living, and 92.6% of the 3‑month survivors completed the second set of questionnaires. Analysis of the QLQ-C15-PAL and BN20 scales revealed significant deterioration in patients treated with WBRT and SRT in physical function (p < 0.001 and p = 0.007), fatigue (p < 0.001 and p = 0.036), nausea (p = 0.003 and p = 0.002), appetite loss (p < 0.001 and p = 0.025), drowsiness (p < 0.001 and p = 0.011), hair loss (p = 0.019 and p = 0.023) and itchy skin (p = 0.030 and p = 0.018). Motor dysfunction (p < 0.001), communication deficits (p = 0.002) and leg weakness (p < 0.001) declined significantly only in patients treated with WBRT. Comparing the two radiotherapy techniques over time, the results showed significant differences in symptom scores for future uncertainty, fatigue and appetite loss. Conclusions QoL data as an outcome of the paper should be considered in decision making on the irradiation technique in patients with small number of brain metastases. Larger studies are required to verify the results according to subgroups.
Availability note (English)
Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00066-019-01506-wAdditional details
Identifiers
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Strahlentherapie und Onkologie
- Journal Volume
- 196
- Journal Issue
- 1
- Journal Page Range
- p. 48-57
- ISSN
- 0179-7158
- CODEN
- STONE4
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Germany
- Country of Input or Organization
- Germany
- INIS RN
- 51039268
- Subject category
- S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
- Descriptors DEI
- AUSTRIA; BIOLOGICAL FATIGUE; BRAIN; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; DECISION MAKING; DELAYED RADIATION EFFECTS; EXTERNAL BEAM RADIATION THERAPY; FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY; HAIR; MEDICAL SURVEILLANCE; METASTASES; NAUSEA; QUALITY OF LIFE; SIDE EFFECTS; SURGERY; SURVIVAL CURVES
- Descriptors DEC
- BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS; BIOLOGICAL RADIATION EFFECTS; BODY; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM; DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; EUROPE; EVALUATION; MEDICINE; NERVOUS SYSTEM; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; ORGANS; RADIATION EFFECTS; RADIOLOGY; RADIOTHERAPY; SKIN; SYMPTOMS; THERAPY; WESTERN EUROPE