Published 2010 | Version v1
Journal article

Ranking of severe accident research priorities

  • 1. Gesell Anlagen and Reaktorsicherheit GRS mbH, D-50667 Cologne (Germany)
  • 2. CEA Cadarache, DEN STRI LMA, F-13115 St Paul Les Durance (France)
  • 3. Paul Scherrer Inst, NES LTH, OVGA 312, CH-5232 Villigen (Switzerland)
  • 4. Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe, D-76021 Karlsruhe (Germany)
  • 5. GRS mbH, Forschungsgelande, D-85748 Garching (Germany)

Description

The objectives of the SARNET network are to define common research programmes in the field of severe accidents and to develop common computer tools and methodologies for safety assessment in this field. To reach these objectives, one of the work packages, named 'Severe Accident Research Priorities' (SARP), aimed at reviewing and reassessing the priorities of research issues as a basis to harmonize and to re-orient research programmes, to define new ones, and to close - if possible - resolved issues on a common basis. The work was performed in close collaboration with 8 participating institutions, led by GRS, representing technical safety organisations, industry and utilities (IRSN, CEA, EDF, FZK, GRS, KTH, TUS, VTT). This action made use notably of (1) the outcomes of the EURSAFE project in the 5. Framework Programme, i. e. the Phenomena Identification and Ranking Tables (PIRT) on severe accidents, (2) the results of the validation and benchmarking activities on ASTEC, (3) the results of reactor calculations carried out in the other SARNET tasks, and (4) the outcome of the research performed in the three thematic sub-domains of SARNET (corium, containment and source term). The main outcome of EURSAFE was a list of 21 topics which included recommendations for experimental programmes and code developments. This list formed the basis of the work in SARP. Also the methodology applied in EURSAFE to consider both the risk potential and the severe accident issues where large uncertainties still subsist was adopted. The analyses of the progress of research and development activities considered whether (1) any research issue was resolved due to reduction of uncertainties or gain of scientific insights, (2) any new issue had to be added to the list of needed research, (3) any new process or phenomenon had to be included in the general PIRT list taking into account the safety relevance and the lack of knowledge, and (4) any new accident management program has to be developed to cope with unresolved problems. Furthermore a strategy plan was elaborated to ensure a wide consensus with the end-user requirements and the objectives of SARNET research activities. (authors)

Availability note (English)

Available from doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2009.09.006

Additional details

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Progress in Nuclear Energy
Journal Volume
52
Journal Issue
no.1
Journal Page Range
p. 11-18
ISSN
0149-1970

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
France
INIS RN
42108397
Subject category
S21: SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS;
Descriptors DEI
ACCIDENTS; BENCHMARKS; COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION; PWR TYPE REACTORS
Descriptors DEC
ENRICHED URANIUM REACTORS; POWER REACTORS; REACTORS; SIMULATION; THERMAL REACTORS; WATER COOLED REACTORS; WATER MODERATED REACTORS

Optional Information

Notes
5 refs.