Published July 1, 2011 | Version v1
Journal article

Initial Clinical Experience With the Strut-Adjusted Volume Implant (SAVI) Breast Brachytherapy Device for Accelerated Partial-Breast Irradiation (APBI): First 100 Patients With More Than 1 Year of Follow-Up

  • 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA (United States)
  • 2. Arizona Breast Cancer Specialists, Phoenix, AZ (United States)
  • 3. Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA (United States)
  • 4. Breast Care Center of the Southwest, Phoenix, AZ (United States)
  • 5. Arizona Oncology Services Foundation, Phoenix, AZ (United States)

Description

Purpose: The Strut-Adjusted Volume Implant (SAVI; Cianna Medical, Aliso Viejo, CA) is a multichannel single-entry brachytherapy device designed to allow dose modulation to minimize normal tissue dose while simultaneously maximizing target coverage. This is the first report on the initial 102 patients with nearly 2 years of median follow-up. Methods and Materials: One hundred two patients were treated at two institutions. Data were collected on eligibility and dosimetry and followed for toxicity and recurrence. Results: The median follow-up is 21 months. Overall dosimetry is outstanding (median percent of target volume receiving 90% of the prescription dose was 95.9%, volume of target receiving 150% of the prescription dose was 27.8 mL, and volume of target receiving 200% of the prescription dose was 14.0 cm3). No devices were pulled prior to treatment completion. For patients with a skin bridge of less than 7 mm, the maximum median skin dose was 280 cGy (median percent of target volume receiving 90% of the prescription dose was 95.2%, volume of target receiving 150% of the prescription dose was 25.8 cm3 and volume of target receiving 200% of the prescription dose was 12.7 mL). For patients with both chest wall and skin of less than 7 mm, the maximum median lung dose was 205 cGy with simultaneous skin dose of 272 cGy. The rate of telangiectasia was 1.9%. Grade 1 hyperpigmentation developed in 10 patients (9.8%) and Grade 2 fibrosis in 2 patients (1.9%). There were 2 symptomatic seromas and 2 cases of asymptomatic fat necrosis (1.9%). Of the patients, 27% were not eligible for MammoSite balloon brachytherapy (Hologic, Inc., Marlborough, MA) and 5% were not eligible for any balloon brachytherapy. The recurrence rate was 1%. Conclusions: The SAVI appears to safely allow an increase in eligibility for APBI over balloon brachytherapy or three-dimensional conformal radiation, highlighting the outstanding device flexibility to maximize the target dose and minimize the normal tissue dose. The device was well tolerated by patients.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.02.018

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.02.018;
PII
S0360-3016(10)00252-X;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics
Journal Volume
80
Journal Issue
3
Journal Page Range
p. 765-770
ISSN
0360-3016
CODEN
IOBPD3

INIS

Country of Publication
United States
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
43065940
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
BRACHYTHERAPY; CHEST; DOSIMETRY; FIBROSIS; LUNGS; MAMMARY GLANDS; NECROSIS; NEOPLASMS; RADIATION DOSES; RADIATION SOURCE IMPLANTS; SKIN
Descriptors DEC
BODY; DISEASES; DOSES; GLANDS; IMPLANTS; MEDICINE; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; ORGANS; PATHOLOGICAL CHANGES; RADIATION SOURCES; RADIOLOGY; RADIOTHERAPY; RESPIRATORY SYSTEM; THERAPY

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2011 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.