Published December 2021 | Version v1
Journal article

A critical analysis of shale laboratory permeability evolution data

  • 1. Key Laboratory of Tectonics and Petroleum Resources, Ministry of Education, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, 430074 (China)
  • 2. School of Resources and Geosciences, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, 221116 (China)
  • 3. Department of Chemical Engineering, School of Engineering, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, WA, 6009 (Australia)
  • 4. IoT Perception Mine Research Center, China University of Mining & Technology, Xuzhou, 221116 (China)
  • 5. Department of Energy and Mineral Engineering, G3 Centre and Energy Institute, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802 (United States)

Description

Highlights: • The boundaries of permeability ratios (k/k0) are delineated by a generic model. • The boundaries of k/k0 are determined by shale microstructural characteristics. • The effects of stress, sorption and slippage on k/k0 cannot be separated simply. • High-level knowledge of sample structure and process interactions are important. This review study aims to identify why current experimental measurements of shale permeability are not consistent with predictions of commonly-used permeability models and explore how the identified reason would guide future research. These goals are achieved through the collection of experimental permeability measured under constant confining pressure (CCP) and constant effective stress (CES) conditions. These data show that permeability ratios (k/k0) vary between an upper bound and a lower bound. A generic permeability model is developed to delineate the boundaries of k/k0 based on shale microstructural characteristics. It's found that for upper bounds are controlled primarily by the fracture behavior while for lower bounds are controlled by the matrix or intact shale behavior. These findings suggest that the model predictions represent only behaviors of either fracture system or matrix while the experimental measurements from CCP and CES observations are for real shales. For real shales the internal dependencies among these factors cannot be fully understood through the nature of the external boundary conditions in CCP and CES tests, alone, but require high-level knowledge of sample structure and process interactions. The nature of permeability time dependencies on the internal process interactions must be reflected in any future experimental and modeling research.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121405

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.energy.2021.121405;
PII
S0360544221016534;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Energy (Oxford)
Journal Volume
236
Journal Page Range
vp.
ISSN
0360-5442
CODEN
ENEYDS

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
54000900
Subject category
S04: OIL SHALES AND TAR SANDS; S42: ENGINEERING;
Descriptors DEI
BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION; FORECASTING; FRACTURES; MATRICES; MICROSTRUCTURE; PERMEABILITY; SHALES; SORPTION
Descriptors DEC
FAILURES; PHYSICAL PROPERTIES; ROCKS; SEDIMENTARY ROCKS; SIMULATION

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd.