Lessons Learned from FUSRAP - 16200
Creators
- 1. US DOE, Office of Legacy Management, Westminster, Colorado (United States)
- 2. US DOE, Office of Legacy Management, Morgantown, West Virginia (United States)
- 3. Navarro Research and Engineering, Inc., Harrison, Ohio (United States)
Description
The US DOE Office of Legacy Management (LM) is the long-term steward for 90 sites remediated under numerous regulatory regimes including the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) sites. In addition, LM holds considerable historical information, gathered in the 1970's, to determine site eligibility for remediation under FUSRAP. To date, 29 FUSRAP sites are in LM's inventory of sites for long-term surveillance and maintenance (LTS and M), and 25 are with the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) for remediation or in the process of being transitioned to LM. It is forecasted that 13 FUSRAP sites will transfer from the USACE to LM over the next 10 years; however, the timing of the transfers is strongly dependent upon federal funding of the ongoing remedial actions. Historically, FUSRAP sites were generally cleaned up for unrestricted industrial use or remediated to the cleanup standards at that time, and their use remained unchanged. Today, these sites as well as the adjacent properties are now changing or envisioned to have changes in land use, typically from industrial to commercial or residential uses. The implication of land-use change affects DOE's LTS and M responsibility for the sites under LM stewardship as well as the planning for the additional sites scheduled to transition in time. Coinciding with land-use changes at or near FUSRAP sites is an increased community awareness of these sites. As property development increases near FUSRAP sites, the general public and interested stakeholders regularly inquire about the sufficiency of cleanups that impact their neighborhoods and communities. LM has used this experience to address a series of lessons learned to improve our program management in light of the changing conditions of our sites. We describe these lessons learned as (1) improved stakeholder relations, (2) enhanced LTS and M requirements for the sites, and (3) greater involvement in the transition process. (authors)
Availability note (English)
Available from: WM Symposia, Inc., PO Box 27646, 85285-7646 Tempe, AZ (US)Additional details
Identifiers
Publishing Information
- Imprint Pagination
- 11 p.
- Report number
- INIS-US--19-WM-16200
Conference
- Title
- 42. Annual Waste Management Symposium
- Acronym
- WM2016
- Dates
- 6-10 Mar 2016
- Place
- Phoenix, AZ (United States)
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United States
- Country of Input or Organization
- France
- INIS RN
- 50083429
- Subject category
- S12: MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE WASTES, AND NON-RADIOACTIVE WASTES FROM NUCLEAR FACILITIES;
- Resource subtype / Literary indicator
- Conference, Non-conventional Literature
- Descriptors DEI
- INSPECTION; INVENTORIES; LAND USE; MAINTENANCE; RADIATION MONITORING; RADIOACTIVE WASTE DISPOSAL; REMEDIAL ACTION; US CORPS OF ENGINEERS; US DOE
- Descriptors DEC
- MANAGEMENT; MONITORING; NATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS; RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT; US DOD; US ORGANIZATIONS; WASTE DISPOSAL; WASTE MANAGEMENT
Optional Information
- Notes
- 3 refs.; available online at: http://archive.wmsym.org/2016/index.html