Published August 1, 2012 | Version v1
Journal article

Subclassification of Recursive Partitioning Analysis Class II Patients With Brain Metastases Treated Radiosurgically

  • 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University Medical Center East, Tokyo (Japan)
  • 2. Katsuta Hospital Mito GammaHouse, Hitachi-naka (Japan)
  • 3. Clinical Research Center, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba (Japan)
  • 4. Tokyo Gamma Unit Center, Tsukiji Neurologic Clinic, Tokyo (Japan)
  • 5. Department of Neurosurgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyoto (Japan)
  • 6. Department of Neurosurgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba (Japan)
  • 7. Gamma Knife House, Chiba Cardiovascular Center, Ichihara (Japan)

Description

Purpose: Although the recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) class is generally used for predicting survival periods of patients with brain metastases (METs), the majority of such patients are Class II and clinical factors vary quite widely within this category. This prompted us to divide RPA Class II patients into three subclasses. Methods and Materials: This was a two-institution, institutional review board–approved, retrospective cohort study using two databases: the Mito series (2,000 consecutive patients, comprising 787 women and 1,213 men; mean age, 65 years [range, 19–96 years]) and the Chiba series (1,753 patients, comprising 673 female and 1,080 male patients; mean age, 65 years [range, 7–94 years]). Both patient series underwent Gamma Knife radiosurgery alone, without whole-brain radiotherapy, for brain METs during the same 10-year period, July 1998 through June 2008. The Cox proportional hazard model with a step-wise selection procedure was used for multivariate analysis. Results: In the Mito series, four factors were identified as favoring longer survival: Karnofsky Performance Status (90% to 100% vs. 70% to 80%), tumor numbers (solitary vs. multiple), primary tumor status (controlled vs. not controlled), and non-brain METs (no vs. yes). This new index is the sum of scores (0 and 1) of these four factors: RPA Class II-a, score of 0 or 1; RPA Class II-b, score of 2; and RPA Class II-c, score of 3 or 4. Next, using the Chiba series, we tested whether our index is valid for a different patient group. This new system showed highly statistically significant differences among subclasses in both the Mito series and the Chiba series (p < 0.001 for all subclasses). In addition, this new index was confirmed to be applicable to Class II patients with four major primary tumor sites, that is, lung, breast, alimentary tract, and urogenital organs. Conclusions: Our new grading system should be considered when designing future clinical trials involving brain MET patients.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.10.018

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.10.018;
PII
S0360-3016(11)03380-3;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics
Journal Volume
83
Journal Issue
5
Journal Page Range
p. 1399-1405
ISSN
0360-3016
CODEN
IOBPD3

INIS

Country of Publication
United States
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
44104052
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
BRAIN; CLINICAL TRIALS; HEALTH HAZARDS; LUNGS; MAMMARY GLANDS; METASTASES; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEOPLASMS; PATIENTS; PERFORMANCE; RADIOTHERAPY; SURGERY
Descriptors DEC
BODY; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM; DISEASES; GLANDS; HAZARDS; MATHEMATICS; MEDICINE; NERVOUS SYSTEM; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; ORGANS; RADIOLOGY; RESPIRATORY SYSTEM; STATISTICS; TESTING; THERAPY

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2012 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.