Published September 2021 | Version v1
Journal article

Comparative and mechanistic toxicity assessment of structure-dependent toxicity of carbon-based nanomaterials

  • 1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115 (United States)
  • 2. State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control & Resource Reuse, School of the Environment, Nanjing University, Nanjing (China)
  • 3. John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138 (United States)
  • 4. School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University, 220 Hollister Dr., Ithaca, NY 14853 (United States)
  • 5. Department of Civil Engineering, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, BUET Central Road, Dhaka 1000 (Bangladesh)
  • 6. Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100050 (China)

Description

Highlights: • Toxicity mechanisms of 7 CNMs were comprehensively and quantitatively evaluated. • DNA damage, oxidative stress, and protein stress were the major MOAs of CNMs. • Molecular toxicity nature of CNMs was concentration-dependent and structure-driven. • Size and structure exerted remarkable influence on the toxicity of CNMs. • Molecular endpoints were validated and correlated with phenotypic endpoints. The wide application of carbon-based nanomaterials (CNMs) has resulted in the ubiquity of CNMs in the natural environment and they potentially impose adverse consequences on ecosystems and human health. In this study, we comprehensively evaluated and compared potential toxicological effects and mechanisms of seven CNMs in three representative types (carbon blacks, graphene nanoplatelets, and fullerenes), to elucidate the correlation between their physicochemical/structural properties and toxicity. We employed a recently-developed quantitative toxicogenomics-based toxicity testing system with GFP-fused yeast reporter library targeting main cellular stress response pathways, as well as conventional phenotype-based bioassays. The results revealed that DNA damage, oxidative stress, and protein stress were the major mechanisms of action for all the CNMs at sub-cytotoxic concentration levels. The molecular toxicity nature were concentration-dependent, and they exhibited both similarity within the same structural group and distinctiveness among different CNMs, evidencing the structure-driven toxicity of CNMs. The toxic potential based on toxicogenomics molecular endpoints revealed the remarkable impact of size and structure on the toxicity. Furthermore, the phenotypic endpoints derived from conventional phenotype-based bioassays correlated with quantitative molecular endpoints derived from the toxicogenomics assay, suggesting that the selected protein biomarkers captured the main cellular effects that are associated with phenotypic adverse outcomes.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126282

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126282;
PII
S0304389421012462;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Journal of Hazardous Materials
Journal Volume
418
Journal Page Range
vp.
ISSN
0304-3894
CODEN
JHMAD9

INIS

Country of Publication
Netherlands
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
54024994
Subject category
S36: MATERIALS SCIENCE; S77: NANOSCIENCE AND NANOTECHNOLOGY;
Descriptors DEI
ABUNDANCE; CARBON BLACK; CONCENTRATION RATIO; DNA DAMAGES; FULLERENES; GRAPHENE; NANOMATERIALS; OXIDATION; TOXICITY
Descriptors DEC
CARBON; CHEMICAL REACTIONS; DIMENSIONLESS NUMBERS; ELEMENTS; MATERIALS; NONMETALS

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2021 Published by Elsevier B.V.