Published August 2016 | Version v1
Journal article

Microplastics in seafood: Benchmark protocol for their extraction and characterization

  • 1. ANSES, Laboratoire de Sécurité des Aliments, Boulevard du Bassin Napoléon, 62200 Boulogne-sur-Mer (France)
  • 2. Laboratoire des Sciences de l'Environnement Marin (LEMAR), UMR6539/UBO/CNRS/IRD/IFREMER, Institut Universitaire Européen de la Mer, Technopôle Brest-Iroise, Rue Dumont d'Urville, 29280 Plouzané (France)
  • 3. IFREMER, Laboratoire Détection, Capteurs et Mesures (LDCM), Centre Bretagne, ZI de la Pointe du Diable, CS 10070, 29280 Plouzané (France)
  • 4. ANSES, Direction d'Evaluation des Risques, 14 Rue Pierre et Marie Curie, 94701 Maisons-Alfort Cedex (France)
  • 5. IFREMER, Laboratoire des Sciences de l'Environnement Marin (LEMAR), UMR 6539/UBO/CNRS/IRD/IFREMER, 29280 Plouzané (France)

Description

Pollution of the oceans by microplastics (<5 mm) represents a major environmental problem. To date, a limited number of studies have investigated the level of contamination of marine organisms collected in situ. For extraction and characterization of microplastics in biological samples, the crucial step is the identification of solvent(s) or chemical(s) that efficiently dissolve organic matter without degrading plastic polymers for their identification in a time and cost effective way. Most published papers, as well as OSPAR recommendations for the development of a common monitoring protocol for plastic particles in fish and shellfish at the European level, use protocols containing nitric acid to digest the biological tissues, despite reports of polyamide degradation with this chemical. In the present study, six existing approaches were tested and their effects were compared on up to 15 different plastic polymers, as well as their efficiency in digesting biological matrices. Plastic integrity was evaluated through microscopic inspection, weighing, pyrolysis coupled with gas chromatography and mass spectrometry, and Raman spectrometry before and after digestion. Tissues from mussels, crabs and fish were digested before being filtered on glass fibre filters. Digestion efficiency was evaluated through microscopical inspection of the filters and determination of the relative removal of organic matter content after digestion. Five out of the six tested protocols led to significant degradation of plastic particles and/or insufficient tissue digestion. The protocol using a KOH 10% solution and incubation at 60 °C during a 24 h period led to an efficient digestion of biological tissues with no significant degradation on all tested polymers, except for cellulose acetate. This protocol appeared to be the best compromise for extraction and later identification of microplastics in biological samples and should be implemented in further monitoring studies to ensure relevance and comparison of environmental and seafood product quality studies. - Highlights: • Integrity of 15 plastics were tested using six protocols of digestion. • Protocols using HNO3 led to significant polyamide degradation. • KOH 10% solution does not affect the integrity of all tested plastics except for CA. • KOH 10% provides effective digestion of mussel, crab & fish tissues. • KOH 10% is the best compromise for extraction and identification of microplastics. - A suitable protocol for microplastic extraction from seafood was identified via the assessment of its effects on 15 plastic polymer types and digestion of biological tissues.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.05.018

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.envpol.2016.05.018;
PII
S0269-7491(16)30397-9;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Environmental Pollution (1987)
Journal Volume
215
Journal Page Range
p. 223-233
ISSN
0269-7491
CODEN
ENPOEK

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2016 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.