Published September 16, 2020
| Version v1
Journal article
Development of a volumetric pancreas segmentation CT dataset for AI applications through trained technologists: a study during the COVID 19 containment phase
Creators
- 1. Mayo Clinic. Department of Radiology (United States)
- 2. Mayo Clinic. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (United States)
- 3. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (United States)
Description
Purpose
To evaluate the performance of trained technologists vis-à-vis radiologists for volumetric pancreas segmentation and to assess the impact of supplementary training on their performance.Methods
In this IRB-approved study, 22 technologists were trained in pancreas segmentation on portal venous phase CT through radiologist-led interactive videoconferencing sessions based on an image-rich curriculum. Technologists segmented pancreas in 188 CTs using freehand tools on custom image-viewing software. Subsequent supplementary training included multimedia videos focused on common errors, which were followed by second batch of 159 segmentations. Two radiologists reviewed all cases and corrected inaccurate segmentations. Technologists' segmentations were compared against radiologists' segmentations using Dice-Sorenson coefficient (DSC), Jaccard coefficient (JC), and Bland–Altman analysis.Results
Corrections were made in 71 (38%) cases from first batch [26 (37%) oversegmentations and 45 (63%) undersegmentations] and in 77 (48%) cases from second batch [12 (16%) oversegmentations and 65 (84%) undersegmentations]. DSC, JC, false positive (FP), and false negative (FN) [mean (SD)] in first versus second batches were 0.63 (0.15) versus 0.63 (0.16), 0.48 (0.15) versus 0.48 (0.15), 0.29 (0.21) versus 0.21 (0.10), and 0.36 (0.20) versus 0.43 (0.19), respectively. Differences were not significant (p > 0.05). However, range of mean pancreatic volume difference reduced in the second batch [− 2.74 cc (min − 92.96 cc, max 87.47 cc) versus − 23.57 cc (min − 77.32, max 30.19)].Conclusion
Trained technologists could perform volumetric pancreas segmentation with reasonable accuracy despite its complexity. Supplementary training further reduced range of volume difference in segmentations. Investment into training technologists could augment and accelerate development of body imaging datasets for AI applications.Additional details
Identifiers
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Abdominal Radiology (Online)
- Journal Volume
- 45
- Journal Issue
- 12
- Journal Page Range
- p. 4302-4310
- ISSN
- 2366-0058
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United States
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 55057360
- Subject category
- S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE; S60: APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES;
- Descriptors DEI
- ACCURACY; CALORIMETRY; CAT SCANNING; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; COMPUTER CODES; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; CORONAVIRUSES; CORRECTIONS; DATASETS; ERRORS; IMAGES; PANCREAS; PERFORMANCE; TOOLS; TRAINING; VOLUMETRIC ANALYSIS
- Descriptors DEC
- BODY; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM; DISEASES; DOCUMENT TYPES; EDUCATION; ENDOCRINE GLANDS; EQUIPMENT; EVALUATION; GLANDS; INFECTIOUS DISEASES; MICROORGANISMS; ORGANS; PARASITES; QUANTITATIVE CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; TOMOGRAPHY; VIRAL DISEASES; VIRUSES; ZOONOTIC DISEASES
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2020 © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020