Published October 2017 | Version v1
Journal article

Individual and collective socio-psychological patterns of photovoltaic investment under diverging policy regimes of Austria and Italy

  • 1. Department of Sustainable Economic Development, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Feistmantelstrasse 4, 1180 Wien (Austria)
  • 2. Department of Sociology, Social Work & Anthropology, Utah State University, 0730 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322 (United States)
  • 3. Department of Landscape, Spatial and Infrastructure Sciences, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Peter Jordan-Straße 82, 1190 Wien (Austria)

Description

Photovoltaic policies show the primary effect of encouraging photovoltaic investments, but also secondary effects of crowding-in/out individuals with specific socio-psychological patterns. To enhance our understanding of such crowding effects, we investigated two comparative study cases with contrasting state support for photovoltaic investments: high financial support in the province of Bolzano/South Tyrol (Italy) versus lower financial support in the province of Styria (Austria). We surveyed individual and collective investors, and as a control group, households who had not invested in photovoltaics at the time of data collection. We first compared crowding effects of diverging PV policies, and afterwards individual and collective socio-psychological patterns to grasp their role for photovoltaic adoption in general. Protecting the environment was found to be the strongest driver for photovoltaic investments. Generous state support in Italy widened demographics, crowded-in economic considerations and persons with an anthropocentric relationship towards nature. However, Italy's high-incentivized photovoltaic policy crowded-out the motivations for collective energy projects and could not sufficiently encourage a sustainable diffusion of photovoltaics, as investments collapsed once state funding was stopped. - Highlights: • Photovoltaic policies crowding-in/out socio-psychological patterns. • We investigated two comparative study cases with contrasting photovoltaic policies. • Generous monetary incentives widen demographics but crowd out non-monetary motives. • Consider values and human-nature relationships in framing energy transition. • Energy transition requires balancing monetary and non-monetary incentives.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.06.063

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.enpol.2017.06.063;
PII
S0301-4215(17)30417-2;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Energy Policy
Journal Volume
109
Journal Page Range
p. 141-153
ISSN
0301-4215
CODEN
ENPYAC

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
49057406
Subject category
S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY; S14: SOLAR ENERGY;
Descriptors DEI
AUSTRIA; FOREIGN POLICY; INVESTMENT; ITALY; PHOTOVOLTAIC EFFECT; SOLAR CELLS
Descriptors DEC
DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; DIRECT ENERGY CONVERTERS; EQUIPMENT; EUROPE; GOVERNMENT POLICIES; PHOTOELECTRIC CELLS; PHOTOELECTRIC EFFECT; PHOTOVOLTAIC CELLS; SOLAR EQUIPMENT; WESTERN EUROPE

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2017 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.