Published May 1, 2017 | Version v1
Journal article

Magnetic Helicity Estimations in Models and Observations of the Solar Magnetic Field. III. Twist Number Method

  • 1. School of Astronomy and Space Science and Key Laboratory of Modern Astronomy and Astrophysics in Ministry of Education, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023 (China)
  • 2. LESIA, Observatoire de Paris, PSL Research University, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, UPMC Univ. Paris 06, Univ. Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, F-92190 Meudon (France)
  • 3. University College London, Mullard Space Science Laboratory, Holmbury St. Mary, Dorking, Surrey, RH5 6NT (United Kingdom)
  • 4. Institute of Solar-Terrestrial Physics SB RAS 664033, Irkutsk, P.O. box 291, Lermontov Street, 126a (Russian Federation)
  • 5. Max-Plank-Institut für Sonnensystemforschung, D-37077 Göttingen (Germany)
  • 6. Research Center for Astronomy and Applied Mathematics of the Academy of Athens, 4 Soranou Efesiou Street, 11527 Athens (Greece)
  • 7. W. W. Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 (United States)
  • 8. Institute of Physics, Univeristy of Graz, Universitätsplatz 5/II, A-8010 Graz (Austria)
  • 9. Key Laboratory of Solar Activity, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100012 (China)

Description

We study the writhe, twist, and magnetic helicity of different magnetic flux ropes, based on models of the solar coronal magnetic field structure. These include an analytical force-free Titov–Démoulin equilibrium solution, non-force-free magnetohydrodynamic simulations, and nonlinear force-free magnetic field models. The geometrical boundary of the magnetic flux rope is determined by the quasi-separatrix layer and the bottom surface, and the axis curve of the flux rope is determined by its overall orientation. The twist is computed by the Berger–Prior formula, which is suitable for arbitrary geometry and both force-free and non-force-free models. The magnetic helicity is estimated by the twist multiplied by the square of the axial magnetic flux. We compare the obtained values with those derived by a finite volume helicity estimation method. We find that the magnetic helicity obtained with the twist method agrees with the helicity carried by the purely current-carrying part of the field within uncertainties for most test cases. It is also found that the current-carrying part of the model field is relatively significant at the very location of the magnetic flux rope. This qualitatively explains the agreement between the magnetic helicity computed by the twist method and the helicity contributed purely by the current-carrying magnetic field.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa6aa8

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Astrophysical Journal
Journal Volume
840
Journal Issue
1
Journal Page Range
[16 p.]
ISSN
0004-637X
CODEN
ASJOAB

INIS

Country of Publication
United States
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
49009134
Subject category
S79: ASTROPHYSICS, COSMOLOGY AND ASTRONOMY;
Descriptors DEI
COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; EQUILIBRIUM; FORCE-FREE MAGNETIC FIELDS; HELICITY; LAYERS; MAGNETIC FLUX; MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMICS; SIMULATION; SUN; SURFACES
Descriptors DEC
EVALUATION; FLUID MECHANICS; HYDRODYNAMICS; MAGNETIC FIELDS; MAIN SEQUENCE STARS; MECHANICS; PARTICLE PROPERTIES; STARS