Published August 2015 | Version v1
Journal article

EURADOS intercomparison exercise on MC modelling for the in-vivo monitoring of AM-241 in skull phantoms (Part II and III)

  • 1. Czech Technical University in Prague, Brehova 7, Prague 11519 (Czech Republic)
  • 2. Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, PRP-HOM/SDI/LEDI, Fontenay-aux-Roses 92260 (France)
  • 3. IST/CTN, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa,Campus Tecnológico e Nuclear, Estrada Nacional 10, ao km 139,7, 2695-066 Bobadela LRS (Portugal)
  • 4. Radiation Protection Bureau, 775 Brookfield Road, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 1C1 (Canada)
  • 5. National Radiation Protection Institute in Prague, Bartoskova 1450/28, Prague 14000 (Czech Republic)
  • 6. Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas, Avd. Complutense 40, Madrid 28040 (Spain)
  • 7. Instituto de Radioproteção e Dosimetria, Av. Salvador Allende, Rio de Janeiro 22780-16 (Brazil)
  • 8. Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Naka-gun, Ibaraki 3191195 (Japan)
  • 9. Institute for Nuclear Waste Disposal, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen 76344 (Germany)
  • 10. Belgian Nuclear Research Centre, Boeretang 200, Mol 2400 (Belgium)

Description

An intercomparison on in-vivo monitoring for determination of Am-241 in three skull phantoms was launched by EURADOS in 2011. The project focused on measurement and estimation of the activity of Am-241 in the human skull. Three human skull phantoms of different complexity were used. A Monte Carlo (MC) intercomparison exercise with the voxel representations of the physical phantom was launched additionally in September of 2012. The main goals of the action were (1) to investigate the different methodologies for developing MC calibrations that might arise from a complex radiological assessment and (2) to compare individual approaches of the participating laboratories in order to determine international guidance for best practice. The MC exercise consisted of three tasks with increasing difficulty, in order to test the extent of skills needed by the participating laboratory. The first task was to simulate a given detector and a well-defined semi-skull phantom. The second and third tasks presented in this paper-introduced more complex simulations with individual geometry and real detector modelling. The paper provides an overview of the participant's results, analyses of the observed issues concerning tasks two and three, and a general evaluation of the whole project. - Highlights: • Participants were able to model real detectors and geometries. • Three head phantoms with different complexities were used. • Typical difference between measured and simulated detection efficiency was less than ±12%. • Simulation with voxel phantom is suitable for calibration of partial body counters

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2015.04.009

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.radphyschem.2015.04.009;
PII
S0969-806X(15)00147-4;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Radiation Physics and Chemistry (1993)
Journal Volume
113
Journal Page Range
p. 59-71
ISSN
0969-806X
CODEN
RPCHDM

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2015 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.