Published May 2021
| Version v1
Journal article
Failed attempt to escape from the quantum pigeon conundrum
Creators
- 1. Institute for Quantum Studies, Chapman University, Orange, CA 92866 (United States)
- 2. Schmid College of Science and Technology, Chapman University, Orange, CA 92866 (United States)
- 3. Raymond and Beverly Sackler School of Physics and Astronomy, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 69978 (Israel)
Description
Highlights: • The analysis by Kunstatter et al. of the pigeon conundrum misses the target by addressing the wrong argument. • The violation of the pigeon counting principle is re-derived based on strong and weak quantum measurements. • It is confirmed that the quantum violation of the classical pigeon counting principle holds. A recent criticism by Kunstatter et al. (2020) [1] of a quantum setup violating the pigeon counting principle Aharonov et al. (2016) [2] is refuted. The quantum nature of the violation of the pigeonhole principle with pre- and postselection is clarified.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2021.127287Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.physleta.2021.127287;
- PII
- S0375960121001511;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Physics Letters. A
- Journal Volume
- 399
- Journal Page Range
- vp.
- ISSN
- 0375-9601
- CODEN
- PYLAAG
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Netherlands
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 54011012
- Subject category
- S71: CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSICS;
- Descriptors DEI
- CALCULATION METHODS; QUANTUM INFORMATION; QUANTUM MECHANICS
- Descriptors DEC
- INFORMATION; MECHANICS
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.