Published March 15, 2014 | Version v1
Journal article

Four-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Axial Body Area as Respiratory Surrogate: Initial Patient Results

  • 1. School of Information Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong (China)
  • 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina (United States)
  • 3. Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina (United States)

Description

Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility of a retrospective binning technique for 4-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (4D-MRI) using body area (BA) as a respiratory surrogate. Methods and Materials: Seven patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (4 of 7) or liver metastases (3 of 7) were enrolled in an institutional review board-approved prospective study. All patients were simulated with both computed tomography (CT) and MRI to acquire 3-dimensinal and 4D images for treatment planning. Multiple-slice multiple-phase cine-MR images were acquired in the axial plane for 4D-MRI reconstruction. Image acquisition time per slice was set to 10-15 seconds. Single-slice 2-dimensinal cine-MR images were also acquired across the center of the tumor in orthogonal planes. Tumor motion trajectories from 4D-MRI, cine-MRI, and 4D-CT were analyzed in the superior–inferior (SI), anterior–posterior (AP), and medial–lateral (ML) directions, respectively. Their correlation coefficients (CC) and differences in tumor motion amplitude were determined. Tumor-to-liver contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was measured and compared between 4D-CT, 4D-MRI, and conventional T2-weighted fast spin echo MRI. Results: The means (±standard deviations) of CC comparing 4D-MRI with cine-MRI were 0.97 ± 0.03, 0.97 ± 0.02, and 0.99 ± 0.04 in SI, AP, and ML directions, respectively. The mean differences were 0.61 ± 0.17 mm, 0.32 ± 0.17 mm, and 0.14 ± 0.06 mm in SI, AP, and ML directions, respectively. The means of CC comparing 4D-MRI and 4D-CT were 0.95 ± 0.02, 0.94 ± 0.02, and 0.96 ± 0.02 in SI, AP, and ML directions, respectively. The mean differences were 0.74 ± 0.02 mm, 0.33 ± 0.13 mm, and 0.18 ± 0.07 mm in SI, AP, and ML directions, respectively. The mean tumor-to-tissue CNRs were 2.94 ± 1.51, 19.44 ± 14.63, and 39.47 ± 20.81 in 4D-CT, 4D-MRI, and T2-weighted MRI, respectively. Conclusions: The preliminary evaluation of our 4D-MRI technique results in oncologic patients demonstrates its potential usefulness to accurately measure tumor respiratory motion with improved tumor CNR compared with 4D-CT

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.11.245

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.11.245;
PII
S0360-3016(13)03606-7;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics
Journal Volume
88
Journal Issue
4
Journal Page Range
p. 907-912
ISSN
0360-3016
CODEN
IOBPD3

INIS

Country of Publication
United States
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
46122393
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; CORRELATIONS; FOUR-DIMENSIONAL CALCULATIONS; HEPATOMAS; LIVER; METASTASES; NMR IMAGING; NOISE; PATIENTS; PLANNING; RESPIRATION; REVIEWS; SPIN ECHO
Descriptors DEC
BODY; CARCINOMAS; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM; DISEASES; DOCUMENT TYPES; EVALUATION; GLANDS; NEOPLASMS; ORGANS; TOMOGRAPHY

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2014 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.