A hybrid compressed natural gas-pneumatic system as a powering option for buses: A comparative assessment
Creators
- 1. Clean Energy Research Laboratory, Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, Ontario Tech. University, 2000 Simcoe Street North, Oshawa, Ontario, L1H 7K4 (Canada)
Description
Highlights: • A newly hybrid compressed natural gas (CNG)-pneumatic bus is designed. • Thermodynamic, economic and environmental performances of this design are comparatively assessed. • The operational reliability of the hybrid CNG-pneumatic bus is evaluated as the highest. • A potential transition from diesel to hybrid CNG-pneumatic buses can halve the CO2 emissions from urban transportation. In response to environmental, energy, and efficiency problems of conventional vehicles, research and innovation on potential electrical, hydrogen, pneumatic, and hybrid solutions have recently been carried out by numerous researchers. The current study develops and evaluates a hybrid type compressed natural gas (CNG)-pneumatic powertrain concept for common buses to provide a cleaner solution for public transportation. In terms of tank-to-wheel efficiency, well-to-wheel efficiency, energy consumption, carbon dioxide (CO2) emission, capital cost and driving range, the proposed system is comparatively evaluated with various powering options. The buses considered in the study are named based on powering fuel type: diesel, compressed natural gas (CNG), electricity, hybrid diesel-electric, hydrogen fuel cell and hybrid CNG-pneumatic. Moreover, an operational reliability concept is developed as an additional assessment criterion to define the most reliable powering choice. The operating conditions and related parameters of the proposed concept are given, and the obtained performance values of the concept are discussed through the comparative assessment study. The current results show that the hybrid CNG-pneumatic bus emits 0.80 kg CO2 per km, making it the second nature-friendly option after the hydrogen fuel cell bus (0.312 kg CO2/km). Furthermore, in terms of operational reliability, the results reveal that the hybrid CNG-pneumatic bus is the most reliable option, with values of up to 66% amongst the evaluated options.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.120865Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.energy.2021.120865;
- PII
- S0360544221011130;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Energy (Oxford)
- Journal Volume
- 230
- Journal Page Range
- vp.
- ISSN
- 0360-5442
- CODEN
- ENEYDS
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 53112401
- Subject category
- S42: ENGINEERING; S03: NATURAL GAS;
- Descriptors DEI
- CAPITALIZED COST; CARBON DIOXIDE; COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS; DESIGN; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; EFFICIENCY; ELECTRICITY; ENERGY CONSUMPTION; HYDROGEN; HYDROGEN FUEL CELLS; PERFORMANCE; PNEUMATICS; THERMODYNAMICS
- Descriptors DEC
- CARBON COMPOUNDS; CARBON OXIDES; CHALCOGENIDES; COMPRESSED GASES; COST; DIRECT ENERGY CONVERTERS; ECONOMICS; ELECTROCHEMICAL CELLS; ELEMENTS; ENERGY SOURCES; FLUID MECHANICS; FLUIDS; FOSSIL FUELS; FUEL CELLS; FUEL GAS; FUELS; GAS FUELS; GASES; MECHANICS; NATURAL GAS; NONMETALS; OXIDES; OXYGEN COMPOUNDS
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.