Published September 2019 | Version v1
Journal article

Defining virtual control group to improve customer baseline load calculation of residential demand response

  • 1. Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08826 (Korea, Republic of)
  • 2. Encored Technologies, 215 Bongeunsa-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06109 (Korea, Republic of)
  • 3. Korea Power Exchange, 625, Bitgaram-ro, Naju-si, Jeollanam-do 58322 (Korea, Republic of)

Description

Highlights: • Virtual control group is proposed for residential demand response. • It is adaptively formed using the pre-collected participation information. • When combined with difference-in-differences, it is robust. • It is evaluated using a real-world dataset (1 yr, 3543 customers). • Improvements are 88.3% for mean error and 3.1% for mean absolute error. -- Abstract: One of the critical challenges in demand response is to calculate the customer baseline load, and it can be particularly challenging for residential demand response where each household's daily electricity load can vary randomly and significantly. A general and widely accepted enhancement method for customer baseline load is to set up an independent control group, but it requires a careful selection process and exclusion of the selected customers. In this paper, we propose the concept of virtual control group that can provide the benefits of control group without requiring the main burdens. A virtual control group is adaptively formed for each demand response event using the pre-collected participation information (through a mobile app in our pilot program), and it can perform well when used with difference-in-differences that can handle the selection bias. The customer baseline load calculation method that combines virtual control group and difference-in-differences is named as V-CBL in this study. Using a real-world dataset collected from a pilot residential demand response program, we evaluate V-CBL's robustness against selection bias and assess V-CBL's mean error performance and mean absolute error performance against the traditional models. Besides the analysis based on the non-event days, we provide an analysis on the actual DR event days as well.

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.05.019;
PII
S0306261919308724;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Applied Energy
Journal Volume
250
Journal Page Range
p. 946-958
ISSN
0306-2619
CODEN
APENDX

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
55012575
Subject category
S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
Descriptors DEI
CALCULATION METHODS; ELECTRICITY; ENERGY DEMAND; ERRORS; HOUSEHOLDS; PERFORMANCE; RANDOMNESS
Descriptors DEC
DEMAND

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.