Published July 2011 | Version v1
Journal article

Gefitinib plus cisplatin and radiotherapy in previously untreated head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

  • 1. St. Luc University Hospital, Brussels (Belgium)
  • 2. University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (United States)
  • 3. Cancer Center, M. Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Institute of Oncology, Warsaw (Poland)
  • 4. All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi (India)
  • 5. Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoynan, Taiwan (China)
  • 6. Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bangalore (India)
  • 7. Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai (India)
  • 8. Institute of Oncology and Radiology, Belgrade (Serbia)
  • 9. Regional Cancer Center, Trivandrum, Kerala (India)
  • 10. Centrum Onkologii-Instytut, M. Sklodowskiej-Curie, Krakow (Poland)
  • 11. Wojewodzki Szpital Specjalistyczny, M. Kopernika, Lodz (Poland)
  • 12. AstraZeneca, Macclesfield (United Kingdom)

Description

Background and purpose: To assess the efficacy and safety of gefitinib given concomitantly and/or as maintenance therapy to standard cisplatin/radiotherapy for previously untreated, unresected, stage III/IV non-metastatic SCCHN. Materials and methods: In this phase II, double-blind, study, 226 patients were randomized to gefitinib 250 mg/day, 500 mg/day or placebo in two phases: a concomitant phase (gefitinib or placebo with chemoradiotherapy), followed by a maintenance phase (gefitinib or placebo alone). Primary endpoint was local disease control rate (LDCR) at 2 years; secondary endpoints were LDCR at 1 year, objective response rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety and tolerability. Results: Gefitinib (250 and 500 mg/day) did not improve 2-year LDCR compared with placebo either when given concomitantly with chemoradiotherapy (32.7% vs. 33.6%, respectively; OR 0.921, 95% CI 0.508, 1.670 [1-sided p = 0.607]) or as maintenance therapy (28.8% vs. 37.4%, respectively; OR 0.684, 95% CI 0.377, 1.241 [1-sided p = 0.894]). Secondary efficacy outcomes were broadly consistent with the 2-year LDCR results. In both doses, gefitinib was well-tolerated and did not adversely affect the safety and tolerability of concomitant chemoradiotherapy. Conclusion: Gefitinib was well-tolerated, but did not improve efficacy compared with placebo when given concomitantly with chemoradiotherapy, or as maintenance therapy alone.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2011.07.008

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.radonc.2011.07.008;
PII
S0167-8140(11)00384-7;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Radiotherapy and Oncology
Journal Volume
100
Journal Issue
1
Journal Page Range
p. 62-69
ISSN
0167-8140
CODEN
RAONDT

INIS

Country of Publication
Ireland
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
43064758
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
CARCINOMAS; COMBINED THERAPY; CONTROL; DOSES; HEAD; MAINTENANCE; METASTASES; NECK; PATIENTS; RADIOTHERAPY; SAFETY
Descriptors DEC
BODY; DISEASES; MEDICINE; NEOPLASMS; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; RADIOLOGY; THERAPY

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2011 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.