Task-based assessment of neck CT protocols using patient-mimicking phantoms---effects of protocol parameters on dose and diagnostic performance
Creators
- 1. Berlin Institute of Health (BIH) , Anna-Louisa-Karsch-Str. 2, 10178, Berlin (Germany)
- 2. Department of Radiology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin (Germany)
- 3. Department of Neuroradiology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin (Germany)
Description
To assess how modifying multiple protocol parameters affects the dose and diagnostic performance of a neck CT protocol using patient-mimicking phantoms and task-based methods. Six patient-mimicking neck phantoms containing hypodense lesions of 1 cm diameter and 30 HU contrast and one non-lesion phantom were examined with 36 CT protocols. All possible combinations of the following parameters were investigated: 100- and 120-kVp tube voltage; tube current modulation (TCM) noise levels of SD 7.5, 10, and 14; pitches of 0.637, 0.813, and 1.388; filtered back projection (FBP); and iterative reconstruction (AIDR 3D). Dose-length products (DLPs) and lesion detectability (assessed by 14 radiologists) were compared with the clinical standard protocol (120 kVp, TCM SD 7.5, 0.813 pitch, AIDR 3D). The DLP of the standard protocol was 25 mGy cm; the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.839 (95%CI: 0.790-0.888). Combined effects of tube voltage reduction to 100 kVp and TCM noise level increase to SD 10 optimized protocol performance by improving dose (7.3 mGy cm) and detectability (AUC 0.884, 95%CI: 0.844-0.924). Diagnostic performance was significantly affected by the TCM noise level at 120 kVp (AUC 0.821 at TCM SD 7.5 vs. 0.776 at TCM SD 14, p = 0.003), but not at 100-kVp tube voltage (AUC 0.839 at TCM SD 7.5 vs. 0.819 at TCM SD 14, p = 0.354), the reconstruction method at 100 kVp (AUC 0.854 for AIDR 3D vs. 0.806 for FBP, p < 0.001), but not at 120-kVp tube voltage (AUC 0.795 for AIDR 3D vs. 0.793 for FBP, p = 0.822), and the tube voltage for AIDR 3D reconstruction (p < 0.001), but not for FBP (p = 0.226). Combined effects of 100-kVp tube voltage, TCM noise level of SD 10, a pitch of 0.813, and AIDR 3D resulted in an optimal neck protocol in terms of dose and diagnostic performance. Protocol parameters were subject to complex interactions, which created opportunities for protocol improvement.
Additional details
Identifiers
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- European Radiology
- Journal Volume
- 31
- Journal Issue
- 5
- Journal Page Range
- p. 3177-3186
- ISSN
- 0938-7994
- CODEN
- EURAE3
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Germany
- Country of Input or Organization
- Germany
- INIS RN
- 52086271
- Subject category
- S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
- Descriptors DEI
- 3D PRINTING; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSIS; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; ITERATIVE METHODS; MEDICAL RECORDS; NECK; NOISE; OPTIMIZATION; PERFORMANCE; PHANTOMS; RADIATION DOSES; RADIATION PROTECTION; TRAINING; X-RAY TUBES
- Descriptors DEC
- BODY; CALCULATION METHODS; COMPUTER-AIDED FABRICATION; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DOSES; EDUCATION; ELECTRON TUBES; EQUIPMENT; EVALUATION; FABRICATION; MOCKUP; STRUCTURAL MODELS; TOMOGRAPHY; X-RAY EQUIPMENT